Estimating the Welfare Effects of Digital Service Trade Liberalisation

ABSTRACT Although digital trade has emerged as a new phenomenon in international trade (WTO, 2018), measuring its evolution and its impact on countries' welfare remains challenging. As the scope of digital trade continues to evolve, our paper specifically focuses on digitally delivered trade and develops a methodology to quantify its welfare effects on different countries. Using the OECD Digital Services Trade Restrictiveness Heterogeneity Index (DSTRHI), we estimate country‐ and sector‐specific trade elasticities for digitally delivered services across 44 countries from 2014 to 2018. Our findings show emerging economies generally have lower digital services trade elasticities, which might be related to the stricter supervision these countries impose. In addition, this paper also estimates the elasticity of digital services trade across specific categories: infrastructure and connectivity (1.647), payment systems (1.635), electronic transaction (1.347), intellectual property rights (1.7) and other barriers (1.329). These estimates reveal the diverse impacts of digital services trade liberalisation on different industry sectors. Then we incorporate these elasticities into a multi‐sector structural gravity model to explore sectoral and cross‐country heterogeneity in welfare effects. Our research indicates, holding other conditions constant, welfare effects have increased globally from 3.5% in 2014 to 4.8% in 2018. This paper provides a robust empirical analysis into the heterogeneous impacts of digital services trade liberalisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Economy
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.70045
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating the Welfare Effects of Digital Service Trade Liberalisation

Yanzhi Shen, Qifei Chen
1 citations
World Economy
Global trade and economics
3.09
article

Estimating the Welfare Effects of Digital Service Trade Liberalisation

Yanzhi Shen, Qifei Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although digital trade has emerged as a new phenomenon in international trade (WTO, 2018), measuring its evolution and its impact on countries' welfare remains challenging. As the scope of digital trade continues to evolve, our paper specifically focuses on digitally delivered trade and develops a methodology to quantify its welfare effects on different countries. Using the OECD Digital Services Trade Restrictiveness Heterogeneity Index (DSTRHI), we estimate country‐ and sector‐specific trade elasticities for digitally delivered services across 44 countries from 2014 to 2018. Our findings show emerging economies generally have lower digital services trade elasticities, which might be related to the stricter supervision these countries impose. In addition, this paper also estimates the elasticity of digital services trade across specific categories: infrastructure and connectivity (1.647), payment systems (1.635), electronic transaction (1.347), intellectual property rights (1.7) and other barriers (1.329). These estimates reveal the diverse impacts of digital services trade liberalisation on different industry sectors. Then we incorporate these elasticities into a multi‐sector structural gravity model to explore sectoral and cross‐country heterogeneity in welfare effects. Our research indicates, holding other conditions constant, welfare effects have increased globally from 3.5% in 2014 to 4.8% in 2018. This paper provides a robust empirical analysis into the heterogeneous impacts of digital services trade liberalisation.

World EconomyVol. 49(3)
Nanjing University of Finance and Economics (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Global trade and economics
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.