Analysis of concrete properties with partial sand replacement by recycled plastic and its cost–benefit evaluation

The rising demand for sustainable and environmentally friendly construction materials has encouraged the exploration of alternatives to natural sand in concrete production. This study evaluates the feasibility of partially replacing fine aggregates with recycled polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastics in concrete. Concrete mixes of grades M15, M20, and M25 were prepared with plastic aggregate replacement levels of 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%. The PET and PVC waste materials were melted, crushed, and incorporated into concrete mixtures, and their effects on workability and compressive strength were systematically examined. The results showed that in M15 concrete, workability remained adequate at 5% and 15% PET replacement; however, its compressive strength gradually decreased with increasing plastic content, showing a maximum reduction of 46.51% at 20% replacement. In contrast, both M20 and M25 mixes maintained acceptable workability across all replacement levels, and their compressive strengths consistently surpassed the standard minimum requirements of 20 N/mm 2 and 25 N/mm 2 , respectively. Comparisons between PET and PVC replacements revealed slight reductions in workability (approximately 5%–8%) and compressive strength (approximately 5%–15%) as the substitution level increased. Although several studies have explored alternatives to natural sand, limited research has systematically examined the combined effects of PET and PVC plastics on the workability and strength of different concrete grades. This study addresses that gap by evaluating the performance of M15, M20, and M25 concretes with varying levels of PET and PVC replacements, identifying the feasible substitution range that maintains acceptable mechanical and workability properties. The findings demonstrate that up to 20% replacement is suitable for M20 and M25 grades without significant loss of strength, thereby contributing to sustainable construction practices through effective plastic waste utilization and conservation of natural resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Materials
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2025.1719644
Primary Topic
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of concrete properties with partial sand replacement by recycled plastic and its cost–benefit evaluation

Mohit Verma, Afzal Husain Khan, Pervez Alam, Umar Farooq et al.
Frontiers in Materials
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
article

Analysis of concrete properties with partial sand replacement by recycled plastic and its cost–benefit evaluation

Mohit Verma, Afzal Husain Khan, Pervez Alam, Umar Farooq, Mohd. Aamir Mazhar
article en

Abstract

The rising demand for sustainable and environmentally friendly construction materials has encouraged the exploration of alternatives to natural sand in concrete production. This study evaluates the feasibility of partially replacing fine aggregates with recycled polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastics in concrete. Concrete mixes of grades M15, M20, and M25 were prepared with plastic aggregate replacement levels of 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%. The PET and PVC waste materials were melted, crushed, and incorporated into concrete mixtures, and their effects on workability and compressive strength were systematically examined. The results showed that in M15 concrete, workability remained adequate at 5% and 15% PET replacement; however, its compressive strength gradually decreased with increasing plastic content, showing a maximum reduction of 46.51% at 20% replacement. In contrast, both M20 and M25 mixes maintained acceptable workability across all replacement levels, and their compressive strengths consistently surpassed the standard minimum requirements of 20 N/mm 2 and 25 N/mm 2 , respectively. Comparisons between PET and PVC replacements revealed slight reductions in workability (approximately 5%–8%) and compressive strength (approximately 5%–15%) as the substitution level increased. Although several studies have explored alternatives to natural sand, limited research has systematically examined the combined effects of PET and PVC plastics on the workability and strength of different concrete grades. This study addresses that gap by evaluating the performance of M15, M20, and M25 concretes with varying levels of PET and PVC replacements, identifying the feasible substitution range that maintains acceptable mechanical and workability properties. The findings demonstrate that up to 20% replacement is suitable for M20 and M25 grades without significant loss of strength, thereby contributing to sustainable construction practices through effective plastic waste utilization and conservation of natural resources.

Frontiers in MaterialsVol. 12
Baba Ghulam Shah Badshah University (IN), Jamia Millia Islamia (IN), GLA University (IN), Jazan University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.