Importing pancreata for transplantation: a single-center experience across evolving allocation eras

Recent changes to allocation systems have increased the geographic distribution of pancreas offers, often originating from outside a transplant center's donor service area or region. The impact of this wider sharing on outcomes remains uncertain. This study analyzed outcomes of primary pancreas transplants (2000-2018) at a large transplant center, stratified retrospectively on the nautical miles distance from the donor hospital. Primary endpoints were death-censored graft survival (DC-GS), patient survival, and graft thrombosis at different time points. No significant differences were found in DC-GS or patient survival for recipients of simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK), pancreas after kidney (PAK), or pancreas transplant alone (PTA), regardless of the distance from the donor hospital to the transplant center. Thrombosis rates were comparable across groups. Imported pancreata were from younger donors with lower BMI compared to locally recovered grafts. These findings support the notion that importing pancreata for transplantation is a feasible and safe practice that benefits patients, increases organ utilization, while benefiting transplant center volume data and reducing waiting times for patients. Encouraging wider importation may reduce waiting times and improve access to pancreas transplantation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Transplantation
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frtra.2025.1698617
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Importing pancreata for transplantation: a single-center experience across evolving allocation eras

Stacey Hidalgo, Didier A. Mandelbrot, Nikole Neidlinger, Dixon B. Kaufman et al.
Frontiers in Transplantation
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
article

Importing pancreata for transplantation: a single-center experience across evolving allocation eras

Stacey Hidalgo, Didier A. Mandelbrot, Nikole Neidlinger, Dixon B. Kaufman, Riccardo Tamburrini, David Al‐Adra, Jon S. Odorico, Glen Leverson, Carrie Thiessen, David D. Aufhauser, Sandesh Parajuli
article en

Abstract

Recent changes to allocation systems have increased the geographic distribution of pancreas offers, often originating from outside a transplant center's donor service area or region. The impact of this wider sharing on outcomes remains uncertain. This study analyzed outcomes of primary pancreas transplants (2000-2018) at a large transplant center, stratified retrospectively on the nautical miles distance from the donor hospital. Primary endpoints were death-censored graft survival (DC-GS), patient survival, and graft thrombosis at different time points. No significant differences were found in DC-GS or patient survival for recipients of simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK), pancreas after kidney (PAK), or pancreas transplant alone (PTA), regardless of the distance from the donor hospital to the transplant center. Thrombosis rates were comparable across groups. Imported pancreata were from younger donors with lower BMI compared to locally recovered grafts. These findings support the notion that importing pancreata for transplantation is a feasible and safe practice that benefits patients, increases organ utilization, while benefiting transplant center volume data and reducing waiting times for patients. Encouraging wider importation may reduce waiting times and improve access to pancreas transplantation.

Frontiers in TransplantationVol. 4
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Wisconsin Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.