Fast radio bursts as cosmological proxies: estimating the hubble constant

One of the most challenging problems in modern cosmology is the Hubble tension, a discrepancy in the predicted expansion rate of the Universe with different observational techniques that results in two conflicting values of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m1"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . We leverage the sensitivity of the Dispersion Measure (DM) from Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) with the Hubble factor to investigate the Hubble tension. We build a catalog of 98 localized FRBs and an independent mock catalog and employ three methods to calculate the best value of the Hubble constant: i) the median value of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m2"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> derived from direct computation combined with bootstrap resampling, ii) the Maximum Likelihood Estimate (MLE), and iii) the reconstruction of the cosmic expansion history <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m3"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>z</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> using two DM- <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m4"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>z</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> relations previously explored in the literature. The values found vary between 53 and 80 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m5"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>km/s/Mpc</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . The result with the best statistical precision (6.0%) is the one obtained through MLE: <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m6"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>70.1</mml:mn> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3.63</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4.19</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mtext> km/s/Mpc</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . On the other hand, when using 100 mock catalogs of 500 simulated FRBs in each realization, we obtain a value for the Hubble constant changes to <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m7"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>67.3</mml:mn> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.85</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.98</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mtext> km/s/Mpc</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . More importantly, the latter result notably increases the statistical precision to 1.5% (the same level of precision as reports from the SH0ES collaboration). Ultimately, the rapid increase in the number of confirmed FRBs will provide us with a robust prediction of the value of the Hubble parameter today, which, in combination with other cosmological observations, will allow us to alleviate (to a certain degree) the current Hubble tension and make inference of other cosmological observables.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2025.1573311
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fast radio bursts as cosmological proxies: estimating the hubble constant

Luz Ángela García, Carlos A. Benavides-Gallego, Eduard Fernando Piratova-Moreno, Ana Carolina Cabrera Blandón
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
article

Fast radio bursts as cosmological proxies: estimating the hubble constant

Luz Ángela García, Carlos A. Benavides-Gallego, Eduard Fernando Piratova-Moreno, Ana Carolina Cabrera Blandón
article en

Abstract

One of the most challenging problems in modern cosmology is the Hubble tension, a discrepancy in the predicted expansion rate of the Universe with different observational techniques that results in two conflicting values of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m1"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . We leverage the sensitivity of the Dispersion Measure (DM) from Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) with the Hubble factor to investigate the Hubble tension. We build a catalog of 98 localized FRBs and an independent mock catalog and employ three methods to calculate the best value of the Hubble constant: i) the median value of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m2"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> derived from direct computation combined with bootstrap resampling, ii) the Maximum Likelihood Estimate (MLE), and iii) the reconstruction of the cosmic expansion history <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m3"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>z</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> using two DM- <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m4"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>z</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> relations previously explored in the literature. The values found vary between 53 and 80 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m5"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>km/s/Mpc</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . The result with the best statistical precision (6.0%) is the one obtained through MLE: <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m6"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>70.1</mml:mn> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3.63</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4.19</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mtext> km/s/Mpc</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . On the other hand, when using 100 mock catalogs of 500 simulated FRBs in each realization, we obtain a value for the Hubble constant changes to <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m7"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>67.3</mml:mn> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.85</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.98</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mtext> km/s/Mpc</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . More importantly, the latter result notably increases the statistical precision to 1.5% (the same level of precision as reports from the SH0ES collaboration). Ultimately, the rapid increase in the number of confirmed FRBs will provide us with a robust prediction of the value of the Hubble parameter today, which, in combination with other cosmological observations, will allow us to alleviate (to a certain degree) the current Hubble tension and make inference of other cosmological observables.

Frontiers in Astronomy and Space SciencesVol. 12
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales (CO), Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores (CO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.