Simulation-based active learning for systematic reviews: A scoping review of literature

Background: Active learning is a proposed method for accelerating the screening phase of systematic reviews. While extensively studied, evidence remains scattered across a fragmented body of literature. Objective: This scoping review investigates whether active learning is recommended for systematic review screening and identifies areas needing further research. Design: We screened 1887 records published since 2006 using ASReview, an active learning tool, and included 60 relevant studies. We also analysed 238 of 336 collected datasets for study design, dataset usage, and implementation. Results: All 60 studies recommended active learning as a means to improve screening efficiency. Despite some methodological heterogeneity, consistent endorsement was found across the literature. Conclusion: Active learning shows strong potential to support systematic review screening. Standardising evaluation metrics, encouraging open data practices, and diversifying model configurations are key priorities for advancing this field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Science
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515251379058
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulation-based active learning for systematic reviews: A scoping review of literature

Guilherme Ribeiro, Daniel Anadria, Rens van de Schoot, Ayoub Bagheri et al.
Journal of Information Science
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Simulation-based active learning for systematic reviews: A scoping review of literature

Guilherme Ribeiro, Daniel Anadria, Rens van de Schoot, Ayoub Bagheri, Jelle Jasper Teijema, Simon Seuren
article en

Abstract

Background: Active learning is a proposed method for accelerating the screening phase of systematic reviews. While extensively studied, evidence remains scattered across a fragmented body of literature. Objective: This scoping review investigates whether active learning is recommended for systematic review screening and identifies areas needing further research. Design: We screened 1887 records published since 2006 using ASReview, an active learning tool, and included 60 relevant studies. We also analysed 238 of 336 collected datasets for study design, dataset usage, and implementation. Results: All 60 studies recommended active learning as a means to improve screening efficiency. Despite some methodological heterogeneity, consistent endorsement was found across the literature. Conclusion: Active learning shows strong potential to support systematic review screening. Standardising evaluation metrics, encouraging open data practices, and diversifying model configurations are key priorities for advancing this field.

Journal of Information Science
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), Utrecht University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.