Polypharmacy and super‐polypharmacy in non‐geriatric, adult populations: a scoping review of characteristics, risks, and deprescribing frameworks

Abstract Background Polypharmacy, typically defined as the concurrent regular use of multiple medications, is a significant concern across various age groups. While much attention has been given to its impact on older adults, the effects on non‐geriatric adults with frailty remain relatively uncertain and understudied. Aim The purpose of this scoping review was to identify available evidence on the prevalence and assessment management of polypharmacy and super‐polypharmacy and guidelines for deprescribing in non‐geriatric adults up to 65 years of age. Design In February 2024, an initial limited search of PubMed using keywords ‘polypharmacy’, ‘super‐polypharmacy’ and ‘deprescribing’ was undertaken and used to develop a full search strategy, including all the relevant and identified keywords and index terms. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA‐ScR) guidelines were followed for this review. Databases included PubMed, EBSCO MEDLINE, EBSCO CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Embase and the searches were conducted in March 2024. Primary, peer reviewed, empirical research (including quantitative, qualitative and quality improvement) studies, that were published in English between January 2000–March 2024 were included. Results Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria. Most studies defined polypharmacy as the concurrent use of five or more medications by a patient. Age and the presence of chronic conditions were consistently identified as common factors contributing to polypharmacy. Most studies identified the need for effective intervention via multidisciplinary teams to identify inappropriate medications. Although included articles did discuss barriers and enablers for deprescribing, no specific information was identified detailing validated deprescribing tools or frameworks for use in adults up to 65 years of age. Conclusion Addressing polypharmacy requires a multifaceted approach that includes deprescribing as a pivotal intervention. There is a critical need for further research to develop and validate evidence‐based guidelines that specifically identify and manage polypharmacy in non‐geriatric adults. These guidelines should be comprehensive, considering the diverse health profiles and treatment complexities of this age group, to optimise medication use and improve overall health outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jppr.70051
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polypharmacy and super‐polypharmacy in non‐geriatric, adult populations: a scoping review of characteristics, risks, and deprescribing frameworks

Gloria Wong, Nicole Gavin, Jitendra K. Trivedi
1 citations
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
1.22
article

Polypharmacy and super‐polypharmacy in non‐geriatric, adult populations: a scoping review of characteristics, risks, and deprescribing frameworks

Gloria Wong, Nicole Gavin, Jitendra K. Trivedi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Polypharmacy, typically defined as the concurrent regular use of multiple medications, is a significant concern across various age groups. While much attention has been given to its impact on older adults, the effects on non‐geriatric adults with frailty remain relatively uncertain and understudied. Aim The purpose of this scoping review was to identify available evidence on the prevalence and assessment management of polypharmacy and super‐polypharmacy and guidelines for deprescribing in non‐geriatric adults up to 65 years of age. Design In February 2024, an initial limited search of PubMed using keywords ‘polypharmacy’, ‘super‐polypharmacy’ and ‘deprescribing’ was undertaken and used to develop a full search strategy, including all the relevant and identified keywords and index terms. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA‐ScR) guidelines were followed for this review. Databases included PubMed, EBSCO MEDLINE, EBSCO CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Embase and the searches were conducted in March 2024. Primary, peer reviewed, empirical research (including quantitative, qualitative and quality improvement) studies, that were published in English between January 2000–March 2024 were included. Results Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria. Most studies defined polypharmacy as the concurrent use of five or more medications by a patient. Age and the presence of chronic conditions were consistently identified as common factors contributing to polypharmacy. Most studies identified the need for effective intervention via multidisciplinary teams to identify inappropriate medications. Although included articles did discuss barriers and enablers for deprescribing, no specific information was identified detailing validated deprescribing tools or frameworks for use in adults up to 65 years of age. Conclusion Addressing polypharmacy requires a multifaceted approach that includes deprescribing as a pivotal intervention. There is a critical need for further research to develop and validate evidence‐based guidelines that specifically identify and manage polypharmacy in non‐geriatric adults. These guidelines should be comprehensive, considering the diverse health profiles and treatment complexities of this age group, to optimise medication use and improve overall health outcomes.

Journal of Pharmacy Practice and ResearchVol. 56(1)
Metro South Health (AU)
Metro North Hospital and Health Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
1.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.