Productivity of denominal and deadjectival suffixal nouns in the Joint Corpus of Lithuanian

We explore the derivational productivity of the following salient suffixes of Lithuanian denominal and deadjectival nouns on the basis of the Joint Corpus of Lithuanian (1.3 billion tokens): -um-as, -yb-ė, -yst-ė, -izm-as, -inink-as (-ė), -uol-is (-ė), -ist-as (-ė), -el-is (-ė), -ėl-is (-ė), -(i)uk-as (-ė). We estimate realized, expanding, and potential productivity (Baayen 1992; 1993) and compare our results to the productivity rankings found in the major grammars and the studies of neologisms. Our focus is on the most productive suffixes of the following categories: quality nouns, status nouns, personal nouns, and diminutives. The analysis demonstrates that in a number of cases the productivity ranking of the investigated suffixes differs from the one presented in the major grammars. Our findings are in part supported by the recent studies of neologisms and other analyses based on corpus data.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Baltistica
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15388/baltistica.60.1.2567
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Linguistics and language evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Productivity of denominal and deadjectival suffixal nouns in the Joint Corpus of Lithuanian

Agnė Navickaitė-Klišauskienė, Virginijus Dadurkevičius, Jurgis Pakerys
1 citations
Baltistica
Linguistics and language evolution
10.42
article

Productivity of denominal and deadjectival suffixal nouns in the Joint Corpus of Lithuanian

Agnė Navickaitė-Klišauskienė, Virginijus Dadurkevičius, Jurgis Pakerys
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We explore the derivational productivity of the following salient suffixes of Lithuanian denominal and deadjectival nouns on the basis of the Joint Corpus of Lithuanian (1.3 billion tokens): -um-as, -yb-ė, -yst-ė, -izm-as, -inink-as (-ė), -uol-is (-ė), -ist-as (-ė), -el-is (-ė), -ėl-is (-ė), -(i)uk-as (-ė). We estimate realized, expanding, and potential productivity (Baayen 1992; 1993) and compare our results to the productivity rankings found in the major grammars and the studies of neologisms. Our focus is on the most productive suffixes of the following categories: quality nouns, status nouns, personal nouns, and diminutives. The analysis demonstrates that in a number of cases the productivity ranking of the investigated suffixes differs from the one presented in the major grammars. Our findings are in part supported by the recent studies of neologisms and other analyses based on corpus data.

BaltisticaVol. 60(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Linguistics and language evolution
10.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.