(De)politicizing animal-related policies and rights: discourses and institutional dynamics in Finnish city councils

This study examines how animal-related concerns are (de)politicized within the city councils of Helsinki, Tampere, and Joensuu (Finland). Using critical discourse analysis (CDA), it identifies four discourses: (1) animals as resources, (2) animals as subjects of consideration, (3) animals as part of nature and city environments, and (4) animals as emissions. The findings show that animal-related policy concerns were often addressed without reference to animals. They became politicized when linked to broader agendas, such as climate, health, culture, or economy, but otherwise tended to be treated as technical or administrative matters. Animal rights concerns were rarely politicized and often absent. The study advances debates in animal politics and critical policy studies by demonstrating how discursive and institutional structures delimit political space while also revealing openings for more inclusive policymaking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Policy Studies
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2025.2599671
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(De)politicizing animal-related policies and rights: discourses and institutional dynamics in Finnish city councils

Suvi Mutanen
Critical Policy Studies
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

(De)politicizing animal-related policies and rights: discourses and institutional dynamics in Finnish city councils

Suvi Mutanen
article en

Abstract

This study examines how animal-related concerns are (de)politicized within the city councils of Helsinki, Tampere, and Joensuu (Finland). Using critical discourse analysis (CDA), it identifies four discourses: (1) animals as resources, (2) animals as subjects of consideration, (3) animals as part of nature and city environments, and (4) animals as emissions. The findings show that animal-related policy concerns were often addressed without reference to animals. They became politicized when linked to broader agendas, such as climate, health, culture, or economy, but otherwise tended to be treated as technical or administrative matters. Animal rights concerns were rarely politicized and often absent. The study advances debates in animal politics and critical policy studies by demonstrating how discursive and institutional structures delimit political space while also revealing openings for more inclusive policymaking.

Critical Policy Studies
Tampere University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.