Clinical outcomes of living kidney transplantation from donors aged 70 years and older: a Japanese multicenter study

The persistent organ shortage has led to the consideration of “marginal” donors, including those of advanced age, but the outcomes of using living kidney donors aged 70 years or older remain debated. This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the propriety of kidney donation from older adult donors by analyzing the association between transplant outcomes and recipient age. Using data from 633 adult living-donor kidney transplants, we compared an elderly donor group (age ≥ 70 years, n = 75) with a non-elderly donor group (age < 70 years, n = 558). After 1:1 propensity score matching, the elderly donor group showed significantly lower death-censored graft survival. However, this disadvantage disappeared entirely in recipients aged 50 years or older, who exhibited comparable death-censored graft survival to those with non-elderly donors (p = 0.743). In contrast, recipients younger than 50 years who received grafts from elderly donors had markedly inferior death-censored graft survival (p = 0.008). In conclusion, using living kidney donors aged ≥ 70 years is a viable strategy to expand the donor pool, but its success is influenced by recipient age. These results support an age-sensitive approach in counseling and decision-making for kidney transplantation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32558-x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Organ Donation and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical outcomes of living kidney transplantation from donors aged 70 years and older: a Japanese multicenter study

Shingo Hatakeyama, Tomonori Habuchi, Chiaki Kajiwara, Norihiko Tsuchiya et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Organ Donation and Transplantation
1.88
article

Clinical outcomes of living kidney transplantation from donors aged 70 years and older: a Japanese multicenter study

Shingo Hatakeyama, Tomonori Habuchi, Chiaki Kajiwara, Norihiko Tsuchiya, Wataru Obara, Hayato Nishida, Yu Aoyama, Ayato Ito, Reiichi Murakami, Chikara Οhyama, Tomohiko Matsuura, Hirofumi Tomita, Ryohei Yamamoto, Mizuki Mori, Hisao Saitoh, Shinya Maita, Mitsuru Saito, Kengo Furihata
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The persistent organ shortage has led to the consideration of “marginal” donors, including those of advanced age, but the outcomes of using living kidney donors aged 70 years or older remain debated. This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the propriety of kidney donation from older adult donors by analyzing the association between transplant outcomes and recipient age. Using data from 633 adult living-donor kidney transplants, we compared an elderly donor group (age ≥ 70 years, n = 75) with a non-elderly donor group (age < 70 years, n = 558). After 1:1 propensity score matching, the elderly donor group showed significantly lower death-censored graft survival. However, this disadvantage disappeared entirely in recipients aged 50 years or older, who exhibited comparable death-censored graft survival to those with non-elderly donors (p = 0.743). In contrast, recipients younger than 50 years who received grafts from elderly donors had markedly inferior death-censored graft survival (p = 0.008). In conclusion, using living kidney donors aged ≥ 70 years is a viable strategy to expand the donor pool, but its success is influenced by recipient age. These results support an age-sensitive approach in counseling and decision-making for kidney transplantation.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Yamagata University (JP), Hirosaki University (JP), Iwate Medical University (JP), Akita University (JP), Iwate Prefectural Central Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Organ Donation and Transplantation
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.