Fair Consent Transactions and Ethical Pluralism

According to the fair transaction view, consent is morally powerful when it occurs in the context of a larger consent transaction that is fair, rather than when one's consent is valid. This fair transaction view represents a novel approach to the ethics of consent and puts pressure on the standard focus on valid consent. If correct, the fair transaction model promises to alter our understanding of when consent in medicine matters morally. In this paper, I examine the prospects for the fair transaction view. I raise both good and bad news for the theory. On the one hand, I show this new approach to consent captures something important when it says that we ought to weigh a number of competing demands fairly. Yet on the other, I argue that this insight is better explained by the larger moral system of ethical pluralism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhaf038
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fair Consent Transactions and Ethical Pluralism

Elizabeth Tropman
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
article

Fair Consent Transactions and Ethical Pluralism

Elizabeth Tropman
article en

Abstract

According to the fair transaction view, consent is morally powerful when it occurs in the context of a larger consent transaction that is fair, rather than when one's consent is valid. This fair transaction view represents a novel approach to the ethics of consent and puts pressure on the standard focus on valid consent. If correct, the fair transaction model promises to alter our understanding of when consent in medicine matters morally. In this paper, I examine the prospects for the fair transaction view. I raise both good and bad news for the theory. On the one hand, I show this new approach to consent captures something important when it says that we ought to weigh a number of competing demands fairly. Yet on the other, I argue that this insight is better explained by the larger moral system of ethical pluralism.

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of MedicineVol. 51(2)
Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.