Enhancing Long-Term Load Forecasting with NLinear Model via Post-Hoc Calibration

This study presents a long-term load forecasting method that integrates the NLinear model with post-hoc calibration. Four calibration techniques—scale, shift, affine, and hour-of-day bias—are applied to correct bias and scale errors without retraining. Using Gangeo feeder load data (2015–2019), results show that scale calibration improved NLinear performance: MAE decreased from 0.5922 to 0.5687 (−4.0%), RMSE from 0.8166 to 0.7800 (−4.5%), and MAPE from 18.79% to 17.72% (−5.7%). Compared to LSTM (MAE 0.7507, MAPE 26.46%) and Autoformer (MAE 0.9712, MAPE 33.86%), the NLinear with scale calibration achieved superior accuracy. Visualization and hourly error analysis confirmed reduced bias and variability, with error medians closer to zero and narrower variance. These results demonstrate that post-hoc calibration enhances the accuracy and reliability of NLinear-based long-term load forecasting.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5370/kiee.2025.74.12.2148
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Long-Term Load Forecasting with NLinear Model via Post-Hoc Calibration

Jun-Hyeok Kim
The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
article

Enhancing Long-Term Load Forecasting with NLinear Model via Post-Hoc Calibration

Jun-Hyeok Kim
article en

Abstract

This study presents a long-term load forecasting method that integrates the NLinear model with post-hoc calibration. Four calibration techniques—scale, shift, affine, and hour-of-day bias—are applied to correct bias and scale errors without retraining. Using Gangeo feeder load data (2015–2019), results show that scale calibration improved NLinear performance: MAE decreased from 0.5922 to 0.5687 (−4.0%), RMSE from 0.8166 to 0.7800 (−4.5%), and MAPE from 18.79% to 17.72% (−5.7%). Compared to LSTM (MAE 0.7507, MAPE 26.46%) and Autoformer (MAE 0.9712, MAPE 33.86%), the NLinear with scale calibration achieved superior accuracy. Visualization and hourly error analysis confirmed reduced bias and variability, with error medians closer to zero and narrower variance. These results demonstrate that post-hoc calibration enhances the accuracy and reliability of NLinear-based long-term load forecasting.

The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical EngineersVol. 74(12)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.