A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Research on Interventions for Externalizing Behavior Problems in Children and Adolescents

<h3>Objective</h3> The overall effectiveness of interventions for youth externalizing behavior problems was studied using a review and a meta-analysis of published single-case research in children and adolescents. <h3>Method</h3> Scientific databases and gray literature were searched for quantitative single-case studies concerned with the treatment of externalizing behavior problems in children and adolescents. Study and case characteristics were extracted, and the studies were rated for quality. Raw graph data from individual cases were aggregated and analyzed by means of multilevel meta-analysis for single-case research. <h3>Results</h3> We identified 78 studies including 270 cases (mean age=8.70 years; 71.48% male individuals). Overall, positive within-person changes during the treatment as opposed to baseline were observed. Reductions in symptoms did not carry through the follow-up phase. However, variations in treatment effects were observed, with larger variations among studies than among cases. Furthermore, studies using observational assessment methods yielded stronger results than studies using questionnaires to assess outcomes. Although the scores for the external validity of the studies were above average, the scores for internal validity were below average. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Although part of the internal validity result can be attributed to underreporting certain quality standards in the studies, it is of great importance for the field of single-case research to start implementing existing methodological guidelines and to comprehensively report case-relevant information. This will, in addition, facilitate our understanding of the variability in treatment outcomes for specific children, and will enable us to learn more about the effects of interventions in diverse youth populations. <h3>Study registration information</h3> Preregistration Meta-analysis of Single-Case Research on Interventions for Externalizing Behavioral Problems in Children and Adolescents; https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/4bewa

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAACAP Open
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaacop.2025.12.002
Primary Topic
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Research on Interventions for Externalizing Behavior Problems in Children and Adolescents

Marija Marić, Patty Leijten, Janneke Staaks, Yvonne Stikkelbroek et al.
JAACAP Open
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
article

A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Research on Interventions for Externalizing Behavior Problems in Children and Adolescents

Marija Marić, Patty Leijten, Janneke Staaks, Yvonne Stikkelbroek, Shawn I. Kok, Laura M. Fetz
article en

Abstract

<h3>Objective</h3> The overall effectiveness of interventions for youth externalizing behavior problems was studied using a review and a meta-analysis of published single-case research in children and adolescents. <h3>Method</h3> Scientific databases and gray literature were searched for quantitative single-case studies concerned with the treatment of externalizing behavior problems in children and adolescents. Study and case characteristics were extracted, and the studies were rated for quality. Raw graph data from individual cases were aggregated and analyzed by means of multilevel meta-analysis for single-case research. <h3>Results</h3> We identified 78 studies including 270 cases (mean age=8.70 years; 71.48% male individuals). Overall, positive within-person changes during the treatment as opposed to baseline were observed. Reductions in symptoms did not carry through the follow-up phase. However, variations in treatment effects were observed, with larger variations among studies than among cases. Furthermore, studies using observational assessment methods yielded stronger results than studies using questionnaires to assess outcomes. Although the scores for the external validity of the studies were above average, the scores for internal validity were below average. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Although part of the internal validity result can be attributed to underreporting certain quality standards in the studies, it is of great importance for the field of single-case research to start implementing existing methodological guidelines and to comprehensively report case-relevant information. This will, in addition, facilitate our understanding of the variability in treatment outcomes for specific children, and will enable us to learn more about the effects of interventions in diverse youth populations. <h3>Study registration information</h3> Preregistration Meta-analysis of Single-Case Research on Interventions for Externalizing Behavioral Problems in Children and Adolescents; https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/4bewa

JAACAP OpenVol. 4(2)
Utrecht University (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.