Co-evaluating the social benefits of urban biodiversity: A case study of the Botanical Gardens at Utrecht University, the Netherlands

Green spaces, as a critical part of urban infrastructure, provide a wide range of social, cultural, and economic benefits through ecosystem services to humans. Human-nature relations and social values created by nature at the urban scale are unique to each context, and therefore, for a concise planning approach, it is essential to fully grasp the benefits through local social values. By addressing the gaps in the literature, this research aims to develop and apply an engaging, adaptable, and replicable monitoring methodology that focuses on co-evaluation, building upon experiential narratives of the social benefits of urban nature. Focusing on a local case study of Utrecht University Botanical Gardens, and relying on transdisciplinary methods such as public workshops, semi-structured interviews, and gamified ecosystem services benefits selection, this research emphasizes a co-evaluation that builds on experiential narratives of the social benefits of urban nature and biodiversity. The results initially identify narratives of urban biodiversity explicating how and what people recognize as urban biodiversity in the Botanical Gardens and the related social values using ecosystem services (ES) benefits. Secondly, alongside narratives, the social benefits of nature and biodiversity are explored through the benefits selected by participants, which indicate the perception of visitors and locals about the place. Ultimately, the results of co-evaluation are reflected in direct recommendations for improving the Botanical Gardens. This proposed methodology, as a replicable and engaging approach, provides a participatory framework that bridges the gap between ecological metrics and local social values when evaluating the recognized and perceived social-ecological benefits of urban nature. • Present a participatory methodology bridging social and ecological values. • Use narratives to present a novel approach for engaging actors in information elaboration. • Integrate biodiversity values in co-evaluation to foster discovery of urban greenery values. • Using ecosystem services concept enhance communication among actors and facilitators.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Urban forestry & urban greening
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129236
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-evaluating the social benefits of urban biodiversity: A case study of the Botanical Gardens at Utrecht University, the Netherlands

Niki Frantzeskaki, Eugenio Morello, Asef Ayatollahi
Urban forestry & urban greening
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Co-evaluating the social benefits of urban biodiversity: A case study of the Botanical Gardens at Utrecht University, the Netherlands

Niki Frantzeskaki, Eugenio Morello, Asef Ayatollahi
article en

Abstract

Green spaces, as a critical part of urban infrastructure, provide a wide range of social, cultural, and economic benefits through ecosystem services to humans. Human-nature relations and social values created by nature at the urban scale are unique to each context, and therefore, for a concise planning approach, it is essential to fully grasp the benefits through local social values. By addressing the gaps in the literature, this research aims to develop and apply an engaging, adaptable, and replicable monitoring methodology that focuses on co-evaluation, building upon experiential narratives of the social benefits of urban nature. Focusing on a local case study of Utrecht University Botanical Gardens, and relying on transdisciplinary methods such as public workshops, semi-structured interviews, and gamified ecosystem services benefits selection, this research emphasizes a co-evaluation that builds on experiential narratives of the social benefits of urban nature and biodiversity. The results initially identify narratives of urban biodiversity explicating how and what people recognize as urban biodiversity in the Botanical Gardens and the related social values using ecosystem services (ES) benefits. Secondly, alongside narratives, the social benefits of nature and biodiversity are explored through the benefits selected by participants, which indicate the perception of visitors and locals about the place. Ultimately, the results of co-evaluation are reflected in direct recommendations for improving the Botanical Gardens. This proposed methodology, as a replicable and engaging approach, provides a participatory framework that bridges the gap between ecological metrics and local social values when evaluating the recognized and perceived social-ecological benefits of urban nature. • Present a participatory methodology bridging social and ecological values. • Use narratives to present a novel approach for engaging actors in information elaboration. • Integrate biodiversity values in co-evaluation to foster discovery of urban greenery values. • Using ecosystem services concept enhance communication among actors and facilitators.

Urban forestry & urban greeningVol. 116
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.