Comparative climate change impacts of different strawberry cultivation systems in Southeastern Europe: A study across open-field and protected cultivation systems towards sustainable production models

The current study evaluated the climate change impacts of three different strawberry cultivation systems (open-field, protected soil-based, and protected soilless cultivation) across four Southeastern European countries: Serbia, Greece, Cyprus and Italy. To this aim, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was employed in accordance with ISO 14040/14044 standards and ReCiPe2016 (H) was chosen as the impact assessment methodology. The objectives of the study were twofold: first, to develop a life cycle inventory (LCI) encompassing all flows and processes related to strawberry production, and second, to identify the practices and processes contributing the most significant environmental burden. The scope of the study was focused on crop production; thus, the boundaries of the system were set as cradle-to-farmgate and the assessment covered all in-field processes: the land preparation, the planting, the fertilization and pesticides' use, the irrigation and the harvest. Post-harvest management practices were assumed to be similar across the different systems and thus fall outside the scope of this study. Results indicated significant differences across the countries examined and the cultivation systems tested. Cyprus exhibited the highest global warming potential, primarily due to excessive fertilizer use in soilless cultivation, while Serbia showed the lowest impact, reflecting more sustainable-sourced agricultural practices. Among the different countries and cultivation systems examined, the open field cultivation in Cyprus and protected soilless cultivation in Serbia exhibited the highest water consumption, driven by climate conditions and plant density differences. The trade-offs reported herein illustrate that no cultivation system performs best across all impact categories; instead, each system's advantages come at a cost in another environmental dimension. Our findings underscore the importance of adopting region-specific strategies to optimize sustainability in capital-intensive strawberry production systems. • Environmental impact assessment of three strawberry systems across four countries. • Serbia demonstrated the most sustainable-sourced strategies. • Region-specific strategies are key to sustainable strawberry farming. • Environmental impacts vary due to different climate and crop management practices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.102589
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative climate change impacts of different strawberry cultivation systems in Southeastern Europe: A study across open-field and protected cultivation systems towards sustainable production models

Davide Raffaelli, Christos Boukouvalas, Magdalini Krokida, Bruno Mezzetti et al.
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Comparative climate change impacts of different strawberry cultivation systems in Southeastern Europe: A study across open-field and protected cultivation systems towards sustainable production models

Davide Raffaelli, Christos Boukouvalas, Magdalini Krokida, Bruno Mezzetti, Sofia Papadaki, Egli C. Georgiadou, J. Milivojević, Evangelos Tsormpatsidis, Georgia Frakolaki, George Α. Manganaris, Nicolas Valanides, Nikolaos Panagiotou, Maria Parcharidou, Anna Kokkini
article en

Abstract

The current study evaluated the climate change impacts of three different strawberry cultivation systems (open-field, protected soil-based, and protected soilless cultivation) across four Southeastern European countries: Serbia, Greece, Cyprus and Italy. To this aim, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was employed in accordance with ISO 14040/14044 standards and ReCiPe2016 (H) was chosen as the impact assessment methodology. The objectives of the study were twofold: first, to develop a life cycle inventory (LCI) encompassing all flows and processes related to strawberry production, and second, to identify the practices and processes contributing the most significant environmental burden. The scope of the study was focused on crop production; thus, the boundaries of the system were set as cradle-to-farmgate and the assessment covered all in-field processes: the land preparation, the planting, the fertilization and pesticides' use, the irrigation and the harvest. Post-harvest management practices were assumed to be similar across the different systems and thus fall outside the scope of this study. Results indicated significant differences across the countries examined and the cultivation systems tested. Cyprus exhibited the highest global warming potential, primarily due to excessive fertilizer use in soilless cultivation, while Serbia showed the lowest impact, reflecting more sustainable-sourced agricultural practices. Among the different countries and cultivation systems examined, the open field cultivation in Cyprus and protected soilless cultivation in Serbia exhibited the highest water consumption, driven by climate conditions and plant density differences. The trade-offs reported herein illustrate that no cultivation system performs best across all impact categories; instead, each system's advantages come at a cost in another environmental dimension. Our findings underscore the importance of adopting region-specific strategies to optimize sustainability in capital-intensive strawberry production systems. • Environmental impact assessment of three strawberry systems across four countries. • Serbia demonstrated the most sustainable-sourced strategies. • Region-specific strategies are key to sustainable strawberry farming. • Environmental impacts vary due to different climate and crop management practices.

Journal of Agriculture and Food ResearchVol. 26
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.