The Impact of Social Protection Expenditure on Poverty and Inequality in High‐ and Middle‐Income Countries

This study evaluates the effectiveness of social protection spending in reducing poverty and inequality across high‐ and middle‐income economies, offering direct insights for policy‐makers aiming to enhance equity outcomes. Specifically, it examines how such expenditures influence three key indicators: the headcount poverty rate, the Gini coefficient and the income share of the lowest decile. Drawing on a panel dataset of 74 countries spanning 1991–2021, we employ panel econometric techniques (e.g. GMM, 2SLS and Quantile regression) to evaluate the impact of social spending. Our results indicate that in high‐income countries, increased social protection spending is strongly associated with reductions in both poverty and inequality. By contrast, although this type of spending in middle‐income countries similarly reduces poverty, it paradoxically appears to diminish the income share of the lowest earners. Further analysis suggests that the interplay of corruption and e‐governance practices underlies these divergent outcomes, highlighting the importance of resilient governance in enhancing the equity effects of social policies. These findings suggest that effective public policies, especially with regard to income redistribution, should integrate anti‐corruption measures and e‐governance improvements alongside social protection spending to achieve sustained poverty reduction and equitable growth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Record
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4932.70024
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Social Protection Expenditure on Poverty and Inequality in High‐ and Middle‐Income Countries

Nadezhda V. Baryshnikova, Jakhongir Kakhkharov, Shuhrat Yarashov
Economic Record
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
article

The Impact of Social Protection Expenditure on Poverty and Inequality in High‐ and Middle‐Income Countries

Nadezhda V. Baryshnikova, Jakhongir Kakhkharov, Shuhrat Yarashov
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of social protection spending in reducing poverty and inequality across high‐ and middle‐income economies, offering direct insights for policy‐makers aiming to enhance equity outcomes. Specifically, it examines how such expenditures influence three key indicators: the headcount poverty rate, the Gini coefficient and the income share of the lowest decile. Drawing on a panel dataset of 74 countries spanning 1991–2021, we employ panel econometric techniques (e.g. GMM, 2SLS and Quantile regression) to evaluate the impact of social spending. Our results indicate that in high‐income countries, increased social protection spending is strongly associated with reductions in both poverty and inequality. By contrast, although this type of spending in middle‐income countries similarly reduces poverty, it paradoxically appears to diminish the income share of the lowest earners. Further analysis suggests that the interplay of corruption and e‐governance practices underlies these divergent outcomes, highlighting the importance of resilient governance in enhancing the equity effects of social policies. These findings suggest that effective public policies, especially with regard to income redistribution, should integrate anti‐corruption measures and e‐governance improvements alongside social protection spending to achieve sustained poverty reduction and equitable growth.

Economic RecordVol. 102(336)
Keio University (JP), The University of Adelaide (AU), Australian Catholic University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.