Integrating risk management into sustaining engineering: Bridging the gap in medical device lifecycle safety

Background Effective medical device risk management is essential to ensuring patient safety and regulatory compliance across a product’s lifecycle. While early design phases often include robust risk identification and mitigation strategies, sustaining engineering (the phase concerned with post-market support, i.e., updates, maintenance, and modifications) often lacks equally rigorous risk management practices. Methods A narrative, scoping-style review was conducted to examine risk management practices during sustaining engineering, following PRISMAScR reporting principles. Searches spanned databases (PubMed, IEEE Xplore, etc.), engineering portals, and regulatory/standards sources (ISO/BSI, FDA, European Commission/MDCG, IMDRF, AAMI), supplemented by gray literature from reputable organizations. Inclusion criteria targeted works published between 2007 and 2025 addressing ISO 14971 application, post-market risk integration, or sustaining engineering workflows. Narrower date windows were applied in specific cases to manage search volume or improve relevance. Of 202 records screened, 16 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 11 were included in the final synthesis. Quality appraisal used JBI tools for peer-reviewed studies and AACODS for gray literature. Results The evidence base included peer-reviewed studies, regulatory guidance, and scholarly frameworks. Key barriers to effective risk management in sustaining engineering include fragmented workflows, unclear responsibilities, lack of traceability, and weak quality system integration between engineering changes and risk management. Conclusions Integrating ISO 14971 principles into sustaining engineering workflows transforms risk management from a static compliance task into a dynamic, continuous process. This approach strengthens traceability, enhances patient safety, and ensures regulatory alignment across the device lifecycle by proactively identifying, assessing, and mitigating emerging risks in sustaining changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435251407517
Primary Topic
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating risk management into sustaining engineering: Bridging the gap in medical device lifecycle safety

Pujitha Gourabathini
Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
article

Integrating risk management into sustaining engineering: Bridging the gap in medical device lifecycle safety

Pujitha Gourabathini
article en

Abstract

Background Effective medical device risk management is essential to ensuring patient safety and regulatory compliance across a product’s lifecycle. While early design phases often include robust risk identification and mitigation strategies, sustaining engineering (the phase concerned with post-market support, i.e., updates, maintenance, and modifications) often lacks equally rigorous risk management practices. Methods A narrative, scoping-style review was conducted to examine risk management practices during sustaining engineering, following PRISMAScR reporting principles. Searches spanned databases (PubMed, IEEE Xplore, etc.), engineering portals, and regulatory/standards sources (ISO/BSI, FDA, European Commission/MDCG, IMDRF, AAMI), supplemented by gray literature from reputable organizations. Inclusion criteria targeted works published between 2007 and 2025 addressing ISO 14971 application, post-market risk integration, or sustaining engineering workflows. Narrower date windows were applied in specific cases to manage search volume or improve relevance. Of 202 records screened, 16 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 11 were included in the final synthesis. Quality appraisal used JBI tools for peer-reviewed studies and AACODS for gray literature. Results The evidence base included peer-reviewed studies, regulatory guidance, and scholarly frameworks. Key barriers to effective risk management in sustaining engineering include fragmented workflows, unclear responsibilities, lack of traceability, and weak quality system integration between engineering changes and risk management. Conclusions Integrating ISO 14971 principles into sustaining engineering workflows transforms risk management from a static compliance task into a dynamic, continuous process. This approach strengthens traceability, enhances patient safety, and ensures regulatory alignment across the device lifecycle by proactively identifying, assessing, and mitigating emerging risks in sustaining changes.

Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management
Becton Dickinson (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Integrating risk management into sustaining engineering: Bridging the gap in medical device lifecycle safety — Pujitha Gourabathini · Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS