Spirits, Land, and Bones: The Social Ecology of Forensic Intervention

ABSTRACT In northern Uganda, the living and the dead remain bound together through land, spirits, and the slow labor of repair. Yet forensic science, when deployed in postconflict settings, often treats bodies as evidence and landscapes as backdrops, severing these ties in the name of science or justice. This article applies a socioecological lens to an “integrated approach” to forensic intervention that begins instead with Acholi understandings of personhood and place, in which spirits, animals, and soil are participants in social life. Based on years of collaborative ethnographic fieldwork—including interviews, community dialogues, and mapping of sites of hauntings and burials—the study shows how Acholi cosmologies unsettle the epistemic foundations of forensic practice. When the dead disturb the living, the problem is not only spiritual but ecological, demanding rebalancing among humans, nonhumans, and the land itself. We argue that forensic anthropology can become an act of listening rather than extraction—one that attends to the agencies of sites, spirits, and survivors alike. Reframing the work in this way reveals both the limits and the possibilities of forensic intervention, offering a vision of justice rooted not in recovery alone but in renewed relations among the living and the dead.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Anthropologist
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.70050
Primary Topic
Anthropological Studies and Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spirits, Land, and Bones: The Social Ecology of Forensic Intervention

Tricia Redeker Hepner, Jaymelee J. Kim
American Anthropologist
Anthropological Studies and Insights
article

Spirits, Land, and Bones: The Social Ecology of Forensic Intervention

Tricia Redeker Hepner, Jaymelee J. Kim
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In northern Uganda, the living and the dead remain bound together through land, spirits, and the slow labor of repair. Yet forensic science, when deployed in postconflict settings, often treats bodies as evidence and landscapes as backdrops, severing these ties in the name of science or justice. This article applies a socioecological lens to an “integrated approach” to forensic intervention that begins instead with Acholi understandings of personhood and place, in which spirits, animals, and soil are participants in social life. Based on years of collaborative ethnographic fieldwork—including interviews, community dialogues, and mapping of sites of hauntings and burials—the study shows how Acholi cosmologies unsettle the epistemic foundations of forensic practice. When the dead disturb the living, the problem is not only spiritual but ecological, demanding rebalancing among humans, nonhumans, and the land itself. We argue that forensic anthropology can become an act of listening rather than extraction—one that attends to the agencies of sites, spirits, and survivors alike. Reframing the work in this way reveals both the limits and the possibilities of forensic intervention, offering a vision of justice rooted not in recovery alone but in renewed relations among the living and the dead.

American AnthropologistVol. 128(1)
Wayne State University (US), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Anthropological Studies and Insights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.