Exploring Sexual Attraction to Animals: A Qualitative Analysis of Zoophile Experiences

This study explored the psychological dimensions of sexual attraction to non-human animals through qualitative analysis of open-ended survey responses from individuals with zoophilic interests (<i>N</i> = 960). Using inductive thematic analysis, we identified three interconnected themes: Parallels with Sexual Attraction to Humans, Animal Welfare Ethics, and Species-Specific Appeal, with a subtheme of Anatomical Attraction. Participants (M<sub>age</sub> 25.05 years [SD = 9.75], 67% men) described attraction mechanisms that both mirrored human relationship dynamics and diverged into uniquely animal-specific domains. Many participants emphasized ethical frameworks centered on perceived consent and animal welfare while displaying limited understanding of species-specific behavioral indicators. Species-specific attractions were frequently characterized by preferences for wolf-like features, intelligence, and anatomical uniqueness. These results have implications for clinical approaches to individuals with zoophilic attractions, animal welfare practices, and theoretical frameworks of human sexuality. Future research should employ longitudinal methods to investigate the development and stability of these attractions and interdisciplinary approaches to address complex questions regarding consent and animal welfare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Sex Research
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2025.2598034
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Sexual Attraction to Animals: A Qualitative Analysis of Zoophile Experiences

Mark E. Olver, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Payton McPhee
The Journal of Sex Research
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
article

Exploring Sexual Attraction to Animals: A Qualitative Analysis of Zoophile Experiences

Mark E. Olver, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Payton McPhee
article en

Abstract

This study explored the psychological dimensions of sexual attraction to non-human animals through qualitative analysis of open-ended survey responses from individuals with zoophilic interests (<i>N</i> = 960). Using inductive thematic analysis, we identified three interconnected themes: Parallels with Sexual Attraction to Humans, Animal Welfare Ethics, and Species-Specific Appeal, with a subtheme of Anatomical Attraction. Participants (M<sub>age</sub> 25.05 years [SD = 9.75], 67% men) described attraction mechanisms that both mirrored human relationship dynamics and diverged into uniquely animal-specific domains. Many participants emphasized ethical frameworks centered on perceived consent and animal welfare while displaying limited understanding of species-specific behavioral indicators. Species-specific attractions were frequently characterized by preferences for wolf-like features, intelligence, and anatomical uniqueness. These results have implications for clinical approaches to individuals with zoophilic attractions, animal welfare practices, and theoretical frameworks of human sexuality. Future research should employ longitudinal methods to investigate the development and stability of these attractions and interdisciplinary approaches to address complex questions regarding consent and animal welfare.

The Journal of Sex Research
University of New Brunswick (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.