The algorithmic public opinion as an open heuristic

There is little doubt that the persisting integration of algorithmic – and, more recently, AI-driven – systems into public opinion formation processes continues to spark lively discussion in the cross-disciplinary debate on critical algorithmic studies and the digital society. These issues raise fundamental questions about the interplay between human and technological actors and the evolving power dynamics that shape the visibility, circulation and interpretation of digital content. In this response, we welcome the opportunity to engage with the insightful commentaries we have received, which raise important issues about terminology, conceptual framing, user agency, technological determinism, and the broader political economic dynamics that concern the conceptual construction of the ‘algorithmic public opinion’ that we provide in our article.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogues on Digital Society
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29768640251406015
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The algorithmic public opinion as an open heuristic

Silvia Keeling, Alessandro Gandini, Urbano Reviglio
Dialogues on Digital Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The algorithmic public opinion as an open heuristic

Silvia Keeling, Alessandro Gandini, Urbano Reviglio
article en

Abstract

There is little doubt that the persisting integration of algorithmic – and, more recently, AI-driven – systems into public opinion formation processes continues to spark lively discussion in the cross-disciplinary debate on critical algorithmic studies and the digital society. These issues raise fundamental questions about the interplay between human and technological actors and the evolving power dynamics that shape the visibility, circulation and interpretation of digital content. In this response, we welcome the opportunity to engage with the insightful commentaries we have received, which raise important issues about terminology, conceptual framing, user agency, technological determinism, and the broader political economic dynamics that concern the conceptual construction of the ‘algorithmic public opinion’ that we provide in our article.

Dialogues on Digital Society
Scuola Normale Superiore (IT), University of Milan (IT), Faculty of Media (SI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The algorithmic public opinion as an open heuristic — Silvia Keeling, Alessandro Gandini, et al. · Dialogues on Digital Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS