The False Promise of Restorative Reproductive Medicine—Restricting Access to Care in the Name of “Natural” Medicine

This Viewpoint discusses restorative reproductive medicine vs assisted reproductive technology and their role in fertility treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2025.22841
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The False Promise of Restorative Reproductive Medicine—Restricting Access to Care in the Name of “Natural” Medicine

Amanda N. Kallen, Caiyun Liao, Rachel Himel
JAMA
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

The False Promise of Restorative Reproductive Medicine—Restricting Access to Care in the Name of “Natural” Medicine

Amanda N. Kallen, Caiyun Liao, Rachel Himel
article en

Abstract

This Viewpoint discusses restorative reproductive medicine vs assisted reproductive technology and their role in fertility treatment.

JAMAVol. 335(3)
University of Vermont (US), UMass Memorial Health Care (US), Yale University (US), UMass Memorial Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The False Promise of Restorative Reproductive Medicine—Restricting Access to Care in the Name of “Natural” Medicine — Amanda N. Kallen, Caiyun Liao, et al. · JAMA (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS