International consensuses and guidelines on multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) by the Academy of Asia-Pacific Professors of Ophthalmology (AAPPO)

Intraocular Lenses (IOLs) have revolutionized cataract surgery, evolving from simple monofocal designs to advanced multifocal technologies that aim to reduce dependence on glasses after surgery. However, multifocal IOLs remain one of the most debated topics in ophthalmology, with passionate advocates and critics. This controversy stems from the balance between their potential benefits and limitations. The Asia-Pacific Academy of Professors of Ophthalmology (AAPPO) formed an international panel of 25 experts from 14 countries/territories who prepared and voted on consensus statements in twelve key areas: (1) the concept of multifocality; (2) refractive vs diffractive designs; (3) blur and haloes; (4) dysphotopsia; (5) understanding diffractive IOL designs; (6) neuroadaptation; (7) factors that may affect the success of multifocal IOLs; (8) alternatives to multifocal IOLs; (9) extended depth of focus IOLs; (10) other considerations; (11) newer IOL designs; (12) future considerations. Among the 47 consensus statements, 46 (97.8 %) have achieved over 75 % agreement. These statements can provide a practical guide for ophthalmologists to provide the optimal care of patients when multifocal IOL implantation is considered when performing cataract surgery or refractive lensectomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjo.2025.100274
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

International consensuses and guidelines on multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) by the Academy of Asia-Pacific Professors of Ophthalmology (AAPPO)

Andrzej E. Grzybowski, Soon‐Phaik Chee, Dennis S.C. Lam, Jackey C.Y. Yau et al.
1 citations
Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
1.35
article

International consensuses and guidelines on multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) by the Academy of Asia-Pacific Professors of Ophthalmology (AAPPO)

Andrzej E. Grzybowski, Soon‐Phaik Chee, Dennis S.C. Lam, Jackey C.Y. Yau, Ruth Lapid‐Gortzak, Gerd Uwe Auffarth, Kevin M. Miller, Richard L. Lindstrom, Youngsub Eom, Steven G. Safran, F.H.F. Leung, H. Burkhard Dick, Rohit Khanna, Jong Suk Song, Mayank Ambarish Nanavaty, Tetsuro Oshika, David F. Chang, Jorge L. Alió, Ke Yao, Shunhua Zhang, Neelam Sharma, Sanjeev P. Srinivas, Damien Gatinel, Srinivas K. Rao, Yong Yao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Intraocular Lenses (IOLs) have revolutionized cataract surgery, evolving from simple monofocal designs to advanced multifocal technologies that aim to reduce dependence on glasses after surgery. However, multifocal IOLs remain one of the most debated topics in ophthalmology, with passionate advocates and critics. This controversy stems from the balance between their potential benefits and limitations. The Asia-Pacific Academy of Professors of Ophthalmology (AAPPO) formed an international panel of 25 experts from 14 countries/territories who prepared and voted on consensus statements in twelve key areas: (1) the concept of multifocality; (2) refractive vs diffractive designs; (3) blur and haloes; (4) dysphotopsia; (5) understanding diffractive IOL designs; (6) neuroadaptation; (7) factors that may affect the success of multifocal IOLs; (8) alternatives to multifocal IOLs; (9) extended depth of focus IOLs; (10) other considerations; (11) newer IOL designs; (12) future considerations. Among the 47 consensus statements, 46 (97.8 %) have achieved over 75 % agreement. These statements can provide a practical guide for ophthalmologists to provide the optimal care of patients when multifocal IOL implantation is considered when performing cataract surgery or refractive lensectomy.

Asia-Pacific Journal of OphthalmologyVol. 15(1)
Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB), Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES), University of Tsukuba (JP), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Heidelberg University (DE), Singapore National Eye Center (SG), Hong Kong Eye Hospital (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN), L V Prasad Eye Institute (IN), Doheny Eye Institute (US), Korps Landelijke Politiediensten (NL), Minnesota Eye Consultants (US), Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum (DE), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CN), Miranza (ES), Fondation de Rothschild (FR), Vasan Eye Care Hospital (IN), University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust (GB), He Eye Hospital (CN), Alto Neuroscience (United States) (US), Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (CN), Capital Health (US), Korea University (JP), University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.