Evaluating the evidence base of targeted skill-building interventions for improving social-emotional competencies in children at-risk for emotional and behavioral disorders

Students at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) often exhibit deficits in social-emotional competencies that hinder their academic and behavioral success. While Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) commonly include universal (Tier I) and behavioral (Tier II) interventions, there is a critical gap in Tier II interventions that explicitly target social-emotional learning (SEL). This systematic review examined 18 peer-reviewed studies evaluating Tier II SEL interventions for K–12 students at risk for EBD. Studies were included if they provided explicit SEL instruction aligned with CASEL’s SAFE framework and measured SEL outcomes. Findings revealed that most interventions targeted self-management, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making, with several demonstrating statistically or educationally meaningful improvements. However, only a subset of studies met the Council for Exceptional Children’s (CEC) standards for evidence-based practices. Variability in student identification methods, intervention fidelity, and outcome measurement limited the strength of the evidence base. Despite these limitations, the review supports Tier II SEL interventions as a promising evidence-based practice for students with or at risk for EBD. Implications include the need for more rigorous research, consistent implementation practices, and integration of targeted SEL within MTSS frameworks to address the complex needs of this population. Impact Statement This review of 18 studies shows that targeted Tier II SEL programs can help students at risk for EBD by strengthening crucial social-emotional skills. However, the evidence base is still developing, with gaps in research quality and consistency. For educators, the findings highlight the promise of integrating targeted SEL supports into MTSS frameworks. Investing in stronger research and implementation practices can ensure schools deliver effective SEL interventions to improve academic and behavioral outcomes for students at risk for EBD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social and Emotional Learning Research Practice and Policy
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sel.2025.100176
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the evidence base of targeted skill-building interventions for improving social-emotional competencies in children at-risk for emotional and behavioral disorders

Gregory J. Benner, Yurou Wang, Carolina Kudesey, Lauren E. Anson et al.
Social and Emotional Learning Research Practice and Policy
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

Evaluating the evidence base of targeted skill-building interventions for improving social-emotional competencies in children at-risk for emotional and behavioral disorders

Gregory J. Benner, Yurou Wang, Carolina Kudesey, Lauren E. Anson, Erica O. Lee
article en

Abstract

Students at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) often exhibit deficits in social-emotional competencies that hinder their academic and behavioral success. While Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) commonly include universal (Tier I) and behavioral (Tier II) interventions, there is a critical gap in Tier II interventions that explicitly target social-emotional learning (SEL). This systematic review examined 18 peer-reviewed studies evaluating Tier II SEL interventions for K–12 students at risk for EBD. Studies were included if they provided explicit SEL instruction aligned with CASEL’s SAFE framework and measured SEL outcomes. Findings revealed that most interventions targeted self-management, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making, with several demonstrating statistically or educationally meaningful improvements. However, only a subset of studies met the Council for Exceptional Children’s (CEC) standards for evidence-based practices. Variability in student identification methods, intervention fidelity, and outcome measurement limited the strength of the evidence base. Despite these limitations, the review supports Tier II SEL interventions as a promising evidence-based practice for students with or at risk for EBD. Implications include the need for more rigorous research, consistent implementation practices, and integration of targeted SEL within MTSS frameworks to address the complex needs of this population. Impact Statement This review of 18 studies shows that targeted Tier II SEL programs can help students at risk for EBD by strengthening crucial social-emotional skills. However, the evidence base is still developing, with gaps in research quality and consistency. For educators, the findings highlight the promise of integrating targeted SEL supports into MTSS frameworks. Investing in stronger research and implementation practices can ensure schools deliver effective SEL interventions to improve academic and behavioral outcomes for students at risk for EBD.

Social and Emotional Learning Research Practice and PolicyVol. 7
University of Alabama (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), University of Montevallo (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.