Interpretation Issues With the Patient Health Questionnaire Instructions

This study identified widespread misinterpretation of the PHQ instructions across community and clinical samples, raising doubts about its validity for both research and clinical decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.3796
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpretation Issues With the Patient Health Questionnaire Instructions

Margarita Panayiotou, Gudrun Vera Eisele, Zachary D. Cohen, Shirley B. Wang et al.
3 citations
JAMA Psychiatry
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
4.55
article

Interpretation Issues With the Patient Health Questionnaire Instructions

Margarita Panayiotou, Gudrun Vera Eisele, Zachary D. Cohen, Shirley B. Wang, Eiko I. Fried, Josip Razum
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study identified widespread misinterpretation of the PHQ instructions across community and clinical samples, raising doubts about its validity for both research and clinical decision-making.

JAMA Psychiatry
Leiden University (NL), University of Arizona (US), University of Iceland (IS), University of Manchester (GB), Yale University (US), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
4.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.