Comparative Analysis of Finite Element and Discrete Element Methods for the Deformation and Failure of Embankment Slope

The finite element method (FEM) and discrete element method (DEM) have been widely applied to analyze the deformation and failure processes of embankment slopes. Although both methods can produce promising results, the choice between them has long remained unresolved. In this study, a failure case of a granite residual soil (GRS) embankment was analyzed. FEM and DEM models were established to simulate the instability process of this embankment slope, and the applicability of both methods to GRS embankments was then evaluated. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) Geotechnical parameters of GRS were determined through laboratory testing, and FEM and DEM models were developed to reproduce the deformation and failure behavior of the embankment slope subjected to rainfall and vehicle loading. (2) Similar rainfall infiltration patterns were obtained from both FEM and DEM simulations; however, significant differences in deformation were observed. The FEM-predicted deformation was 0.075 m after rainfall, indicating that the embankment remained stable. In contrast, the DEM-predicted deformation reached 1.4 m, indicating that the embankment slope had already become unstable. (3) The DEM simulation closely reproduced the failure of the GRS embankment slope observed in the field. It realistically captures the process of particle disintegration in GRS caused by rainfall infiltration, as well as the subsequent slope collapse. Therefore, DEM can be regarded as the most appropriate approach for modeling the instability of GRS embankment slopes.