First Search for Dark Sector <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:m

We present MicroBooNE’s first search for dark sector <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:msup> <a:mi>e</a:mi> <a:mo>+</a:mo> </a:msup> <a:msup> <a:mi>e</a:mi> <a:mo>−</a:mo> </a:msup> </a:math> explanations of the long-standing MiniBooNE anomaly. The MiniBooNE anomaly has garnered significant attention over the past 20 years including previous MicroBooNE investigations into both anomalous electron and photon excesses, but its origin still remains unclear. In this Letter, we provide the first direct test of dark sector models in which dark neutrinos, produced through neutrino-induced scattering, decay into missing energy and visible <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:msup> <c:mi>e</c:mi> <c:mo>+</c:mo> </c:msup> <c:msup> <c:mi>e</c:mi> <c:mo>−</c:mo> </c:msup> </c:math> pairs comprising the MiniBooNE anomaly. Many such models have recently gained traction as a viable solution to the anomaly while evading past bounds. Using an exposure of <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <e:mn>6.87</e:mn> <e:mo>×</e:mo> <e:msup> <e:mn>10</e:mn> <e:mn>20</e:mn> </e:msup> </e:math> protons-on-target in the Booster Neutrino Beam, we implement a selection targeting forward-going, coherently produced <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:msup> <g:mi>e</g:mi> <g:mo>+</g:mo> </g:msup> <g:msup> <g:mi>e</g:mi> <g:mo>−</g:mo> </g:msup> </g:math> events. After unblinding, we observe 95 events, which we compare with the constrained background-only prediction of <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <i:mn>69.7</i:mn> <i:mo>±</i:mo> <i:mn>17.3</i:mn> </i:math> . This analysis sets the world’s first direct limits on these dark sector models and, at the 95% confidence level, excludes the entirety of the single dark neutrino and majority of the dual dark neutrino, parameter space that is viable as a solution to the MiniBooNE anomaly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Letters
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/3q7x-ks7h
Primary Topic
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

First Search for Dark Sector <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:m

Karl J. Friston
Physical Review Letters
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
article

First Search for Dark Sector <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:m

Karl J. Friston
article en

Abstract

We present MicroBooNE’s first search for dark sector <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:msup> <a:mi>e</a:mi> <a:mo>+</a:mo> </a:msup> <a:msup> <a:mi>e</a:mi> <a:mo>−</a:mo> </a:msup> </a:math> explanations of the long-standing MiniBooNE anomaly. The MiniBooNE anomaly has garnered significant attention over the past 20 years including previous MicroBooNE investigations into both anomalous electron and photon excesses, but its origin still remains unclear. In this Letter, we provide the first direct test of dark sector models in which dark neutrinos, produced through neutrino-induced scattering, decay into missing energy and visible <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:msup> <c:mi>e</c:mi> <c:mo>+</c:mo> </c:msup> <c:msup> <c:mi>e</c:mi> <c:mo>−</c:mo> </c:msup> </c:math> pairs comprising the MiniBooNE anomaly. Many such models have recently gained traction as a viable solution to the anomaly while evading past bounds. Using an exposure of <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <e:mn>6.87</e:mn> <e:mo>×</e:mo> <e:msup> <e:mn>10</e:mn> <e:mn>20</e:mn> </e:msup> </e:math> protons-on-target in the Booster Neutrino Beam, we implement a selection targeting forward-going, coherently produced <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:msup> <g:mi>e</g:mi> <g:mo>+</g:mo> </g:msup> <g:msup> <g:mi>e</g:mi> <g:mo>−</g:mo> </g:msup> </g:math> events. After unblinding, we observe 95 events, which we compare with the constrained background-only prediction of <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <i:mn>69.7</i:mn> <i:mo>±</i:mo> <i:mn>17.3</i:mn> </i:math> . This analysis sets the world’s first direct limits on these dark sector models and, at the 95% confidence level, excludes the entirety of the single dark neutrino and majority of the dual dark neutrino, parameter space that is viable as a solution to the MiniBooNE anomaly.

Physical Review LettersVol. 136(12)
New Mexico State University (US), University of Bern (CH), Louisiana State University (US), Tufts University (US), Argonne National Laboratory (US), Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (US), Los Alamos National Laboratory (US), University of Kansas (US), Tel Aviv University (IL), Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of Pittsburgh (US), Universidad de Granada (ES), Illinois Institute of Technology (US), South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (US), Kansas State University (US), Brookhaven National Laboratory (US), Nankai University (CN), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Michigan (US), University of Minnesota System (US), Harvard University Press (US), SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US), University of California System (US), University of Manchester (GB), University of Warwick (GB), University of Oxford (GB), University of Chicago (US), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL), National Centre for Nuclear Research (PL), Instituto de Física La Plata (AR), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bologna (IT), Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (ES), Imperial College London (GB), Indiana University (US), University of Cincinnati (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), European Organization for Nuclear Research (CH), Lancaster University (GB), Syracuse University (US), University of Southern Maine (US), Columbia University (US), Michigan State University (US), Colorado State University (US), University of Bologna (IT), UCLouvain (BE), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.