Toward Scientific Rigor: Setting Standards for Indirect Calorimetry Analysis and Reporting

Indirect calorimetry determines energy expenditure by measuring respiratory gas exchange. The approach is based on the principle that nutrient metabolism consumes O2 and produces CO2 and water in predictable ratios that can be compared with heat production. Due to the impracticality and high cost of direct calorimetry, indirect calorimetry is the major approach for modern metabolic studies in preclinical models. Despite the broad adoption of this method in rodent phenotyping, the field has lacked standardized methods for analyzing, representing, and sharing these data, limiting scientific progress. The recent review in Nature Metabolism by the International Indirect Calorimetry Consensus Committee (IICCC) addresses the lack of standardized methods by providing updated guidelines for data processing and representation and emphasizes the importance of shared data repositories tailored to these studies. These expert consensus standards aim to improve transparency, facilitate data sharing and archiving, and enhance cross-study comparability. We encourage authors submitting to Diabetes to adopt the IICCC guidelines to strengthen rigor and reproducibility in the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2337/db25-0998
Primary Topic
thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward Scientific Rigor: Setting Standards for Indirect Calorimetry Analysis and Reporting

Mark A. Herman, Sean M. Hartig, Elizabeth Lien Lieu
Diabetes
thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses
article

Toward Scientific Rigor: Setting Standards for Indirect Calorimetry Analysis and Reporting

Mark A. Herman, Sean M. Hartig, Elizabeth Lien Lieu
article en

Abstract

Indirect calorimetry determines energy expenditure by measuring respiratory gas exchange. The approach is based on the principle that nutrient metabolism consumes O2 and produces CO2 and water in predictable ratios that can be compared with heat production. Due to the impracticality and high cost of direct calorimetry, indirect calorimetry is the major approach for modern metabolic studies in preclinical models. Despite the broad adoption of this method in rodent phenotyping, the field has lacked standardized methods for analyzing, representing, and sharing these data, limiting scientific progress. The recent review in Nature Metabolism by the International Indirect Calorimetry Consensus Committee (IICCC) addresses the lack of standardized methods by providing updated guidelines for data processing and representation and emphasizes the importance of shared data repositories tailored to these studies. These expert consensus standards aim to improve transparency, facilitate data sharing and archiving, and enhance cross-study comparability. We encourage authors submitting to Diabetes to adopt the IICCC guidelines to strengthen rigor and reproducibility in the field.

DiabetesVol. 75(3)
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Toward Scientific Rigor: Setting Standards for Indirect Calorimetry Analysis and Reporting — Mark A. Herman, Sean M. Hartig, et al. · Diabetes (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS