The cost of a checkbox

The urine drug screen persists as a routine checkbox in many trauma order sets. Derived and often unchanged from 40-year-old workplace drug testing panels, the urine drug screen rarely, if ever, informs trauma care and does not establish acute intoxication or impairment. Beyond low yield, the urine drug screen leads to unrecognized downstream harms. Clinically, the urine drug screen can contribute to diagnostic anchoring or false assurance of drug abstinence. Months or years later, when hospital records surface in litigation over insurance claims or civil suits, or in criminal proceedings, the urine drug screen may be misinterpreted to attribute fault, despite providing no evidence of impairment at the time of the injury or accident. Trauma protocols should retire routine urine drug screening from order sets and instead prioritize validated, interview-based screening methods, consistent with American College of Surgeons guidelines. In select cases in which a urine drug screen is warranted, confirmation testing should be the norm and is available at most institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000004847
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The cost of a checkbox

David H. Schaffer
The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

The cost of a checkbox

David H. Schaffer
article en

Abstract

The urine drug screen persists as a routine checkbox in many trauma order sets. Derived and often unchanged from 40-year-old workplace drug testing panels, the urine drug screen rarely, if ever, informs trauma care and does not establish acute intoxication or impairment. Beyond low yield, the urine drug screen leads to unrecognized downstream harms. Clinically, the urine drug screen can contribute to diagnostic anchoring or false assurance of drug abstinence. Months or years later, when hospital records surface in litigation over insurance claims or civil suits, or in criminal proceedings, the urine drug screen may be misinterpreted to attribute fault, despite providing no evidence of impairment at the time of the injury or accident. Trauma protocols should retire routine urine drug screening from order sets and instead prioritize validated, interview-based screening methods, consistent with American College of Surgeons guidelines. In select cases in which a urine drug screen is warranted, confirmation testing should be the norm and is available at most institutions.

The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical CareVol. 100(4)
Prisma Health (US), Apple (Israel) (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.