Multistate imaginarity and coherence in qubit systems

Traditionally, the characterization of quantum resources has focused on individual quantum states. Recent literature, however, has increasingly explored the characterization of resources in states—ordered collections of states indexed by a varying parameter. In this work, we provide a unitary-invariant framework to pinpoint imaginarity and coherence in sets of qubit states: We prove that Bloch vectors must be coplanar to be imaginarity free and collinear to be incoherent, yielding exact rank-based tests of coherence and imaginarity and closed-form bounds for existing robustness quantifiers, all based on two-state overlaps only. We also show that the set of imaginarity-free multistates is not convex, and that third-order invariants completely characterize multistate imaginarity of single-qubits but not of higher-dimensional systems. As our main technical result, we show that Bargmann invariant of single-qubit states is determined (up to conjugation) by two-state overlaps. Beyond qubits, we give purity and system-agnostic coherence witnesses from equality constraints on higher-order invariants and connect our results to practical protocols—characterization of partial distinguishability, spin-chirality detection, and subchannel discrimination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. A/Physical review, A
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/tpgw-v6ht
Primary Topic
Quantum Information and Cryptography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multistate imaginarity and coherence in qubit systems

Rafael Wagner, Mao-Sheng Li, Lin Zhang
Physical review. A/Physical review, A
Quantum Information and Cryptography
article

Multistate imaginarity and coherence in qubit systems

Rafael Wagner, Mao-Sheng Li, Lin Zhang
article en

Abstract

Traditionally, the characterization of quantum resources has focused on individual quantum states. Recent literature, however, has increasingly explored the characterization of resources in states—ordered collections of states indexed by a varying parameter. In this work, we provide a unitary-invariant framework to pinpoint imaginarity and coherence in sets of qubit states: We prove that Bloch vectors must be coplanar to be imaginarity free and collinear to be incoherent, yielding exact rank-based tests of coherence and imaginarity and closed-form bounds for existing robustness quantifiers, all based on two-state overlaps only. We also show that the set of imaginarity-free multistates is not convex, and that third-order invariants completely characterize multistate imaginarity of single-qubits but not of higher-dimensional systems. As our main technical result, we show that Bargmann invariant of single-qubit states is determined (up to conjugation) by two-state overlaps. Beyond qubits, we give purity and system-agnostic coherence witnesses from equality constraints on higher-order invariants and connect our results to practical protocols—characterization of partial distinguishability, spin-chirality detection, and subchannel discrimination.

Physical review. A/Physical review, AVol. 113(1)
Universität Ulm (DE), International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory (PT), Hangzhou Dianzi University (CN), South China University of Technology (CN), University of Minho (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Quantum Information and Cryptography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Multistate imaginarity and coherence in qubit systems — Rafael Wagner, Mao-Sheng Li, et al. · Physical review. A/Physical review, A (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS