Optimizing Row Ratio Configurations for Enhanced Productivity and Resource-Use Efficiency in Maize–Alfalfa Intercropping

Maize-alfalfa intercropping is practiced in Northeast China to improve land productivity and forage production. However, competition between the two crops can reduce system performance, which calls for an emphasis on optimal row ratio. Hence, the current study evaluated the effects of diverse maize-alfalfa row ratio configurations (1:1, 2:1, 2:2, 3:1, 3:2, and 3:3) on resource-use efficiency, physiological traits, and yield performance. It was noted that the mono-cropping system had higher physiological and agronomic values for both crops. With regard to the intercropping configuration, the 2:2 steadily outperformed all other intercropping row ratios. Whereas alfalfa grew tallest in 2:2, maize plant height peaked under the 3:1. Photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content were highest under 2:2, for both crops. The yield results indicated that alfalfa achieved maximum forage and biomass, whereas maize performed best under a 3:1 configuration. Outstandingly, under the 2:2 ratio, the cumulative system yield exceeded alfalfa mono-cropping by 55% and maize mono-cropping by 56-57%. There was superior complementarity and land-use advantage under 2:2, as indicated by the highest resource-use indicators of LER (land equivalent ratio), LEC (land equivalent coefficient), SPI (system productivity index), and K (crowding index). Competitive Indices showed that competition was more balanced under 2:2, with maize dominating in systems with higher maize proportions. Overall, the 2:2 row ratio provided the best balance of reduced competition and enhanced complementarity, offering a more efficient and sustainable maize-alfalfa intercropping strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plants
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14243846
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Row Ratio Configurations for Enhanced Productivity and Resource-Use Efficiency in Maize–Alfalfa Intercropping

Zeqiang Shao, W. Ji, Z. X. Meng, Harun I. Gitari et al.
5 citations
Plants
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
9.51
article

Optimizing Row Ratio Configurations for Enhanced Productivity and Resource-Use Efficiency in Maize–Alfalfa Intercropping

Zeqiang Shao, W. Ji, Z. X. Meng, Harun I. Gitari, Xiaolong Yan, Jamal Nasar, Zhihao Zhang, Huimin Ma, C. Fan, Shiqiang Hu
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Maize-alfalfa intercropping is practiced in Northeast China to improve land productivity and forage production. However, competition between the two crops can reduce system performance, which calls for an emphasis on optimal row ratio. Hence, the current study evaluated the effects of diverse maize-alfalfa row ratio configurations (1:1, 2:1, 2:2, 3:1, 3:2, and 3:3) on resource-use efficiency, physiological traits, and yield performance. It was noted that the mono-cropping system had higher physiological and agronomic values for both crops. With regard to the intercropping configuration, the 2:2 steadily outperformed all other intercropping row ratios. Whereas alfalfa grew tallest in 2:2, maize plant height peaked under the 3:1. Photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content were highest under 2:2, for both crops. The yield results indicated that alfalfa achieved maximum forage and biomass, whereas maize performed best under a 3:1 configuration. Outstandingly, under the 2:2 ratio, the cumulative system yield exceeded alfalfa mono-cropping by 55% and maize mono-cropping by 56-57%. There was superior complementarity and land-use advantage under 2:2, as indicated by the highest resource-use indicators of LER (land equivalent ratio), LEC (land equivalent coefficient), SPI (system productivity index), and K (crowding index). Competitive Indices showed that competition was more balanced under 2:2, with maize dominating in systems with higher maize proportions. Overall, the 2:2 row ratio provided the best balance of reduced competition and enhanced complementarity, offering a more efficient and sustainable maize-alfalfa intercropping strategy.

PlantsVol. 14(24)
IHI Corporation (United States) (US), Kenyatta University (KE), Guizhou University (CN), Jilin University of Chemical Technology (CN), Jilin Agricultural University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Guizhou University, Jilin University, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jilin Institute of Chemical Technology, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
9.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.