Integrated assessment of greenhouse gas emissions in extensive livestock farming systems

Extensive livestock farming has been described only in part, with previous studies focusing mainly on individual aspects such as the breeds reared, economic profitability, or environmental impact. However, the current scenario of increasing climate uncertainty highlights the need for a more comprehensive description of typologies of extensive production systems. In this study, 52 dehesa farms were analysed between 2021 and 2022 using technical, economic and environmental indicators. To determine their main characteristics, a Principal Component Analysis was conducted, followed by Cluster Analysis. Three factors were identified: (i) level of intensification and emissions, (ii) land tenure and labour and (iii) dependence on CAP subsidies. These factors explained 67.63% of total variance, and based on them, four farm types were classified. Results showed that less intensive farms had lower environmental impact (cluster 1, 2, 3: 991.99, 727.20 and 1049.87 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup>, respectively) and lower dependence on external inputs. More intensified farms (cluster 4: 2183.58 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup>), although emissions were higher, showed better economic performance. Cluster 3 represented the most sustainable model since farms combined good technical and economic performance while applying regenerative environmental management practices. This classification can support the development of tailored management strategies to guide extensive livestock systems towards improved sustainability and resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32814-0
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated assessment of greenhouse gas emissions in extensive livestock farming systems

A. Rodriguez‐Ledesma, M. Escribano, Andrés Horrillo, P. Gaspar
Scientific Reports
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Integrated assessment of greenhouse gas emissions in extensive livestock farming systems

A. Rodriguez‐Ledesma, M. Escribano, Andrés Horrillo, P. Gaspar
article en

Abstract

Extensive livestock farming has been described only in part, with previous studies focusing mainly on individual aspects such as the breeds reared, economic profitability, or environmental impact. However, the current scenario of increasing climate uncertainty highlights the need for a more comprehensive description of typologies of extensive production systems. In this study, 52 dehesa farms were analysed between 2021 and 2022 using technical, economic and environmental indicators. To determine their main characteristics, a Principal Component Analysis was conducted, followed by Cluster Analysis. Three factors were identified: (i) level of intensification and emissions, (ii) land tenure and labour and (iii) dependence on CAP subsidies. These factors explained 67.63% of total variance, and based on them, four farm types were classified. Results showed that less intensive farms had lower environmental impact (cluster 1, 2, 3: 991.99, 727.20 and 1049.87 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup>, respectively) and lower dependence on external inputs. More intensified farms (cluster 4: 2183.58 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup>), although emissions were higher, showed better economic performance. Cluster 3 represented the most sustainable model since farms combined good technical and economic performance while applying regenerative environmental management practices. This classification can support the development of tailored management strategies to guide extensive livestock systems towards improved sustainability and resilience.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Government of Extremadura (ES), Universidad de Extremadura (ES)
European Commission, Junta de Extremadura, European Regional Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.