Radiative and Precipitation Processes Make it Easier to Match the Temperature Record and Harder to Constrain Future Warming

Abstract By examining the historical temperature record during the industrial era, we can infer the climate's sensitivity to radiative perturbations, given knowledge of historical forcings. Energy conservation enforces a negative correlation between the climate feedback and historical forcing for a given change in global‐mean temperature. Here, we examine the negative correlation between the radiative forcing due to aerosol‐cloud interactions and the shortwave cloud feedback to warming that appears in a perturbed parameter ensemble (PPE). The PPE is not tuned to match the historical record, yet a negative correlation emerges over the extratropics due to the combined effects of liquid cloud precipitation efficiency and radiative saturation in the shortwave. Using an energy balance model, we argue that these processes combine to push Earth System Models to yield a temperature record in keeping with observations, but also limit our ability to constrain future warming posterior with the temperature record.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl117386
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiative and Precipitation Processes Make it Easier to Match the Temperature Record and Harder to Constrain Future Warming

Andrew Gettelman, Duncan Watson‐Parris, Daniel T. McCoy, Trude Eidhammer et al.
Geophysical Research Letters
Climate variability and models
article

Radiative and Precipitation Processes Make it Easier to Match the Temperature Record and Harder to Constrain Future Warming

Andrew Gettelman, Duncan Watson‐Parris, Daniel T. McCoy, Trude Eidhammer, Geethma Werapitiya, Ci Song
article en

Abstract

Abstract By examining the historical temperature record during the industrial era, we can infer the climate's sensitivity to radiative perturbations, given knowledge of historical forcings. Energy conservation enforces a negative correlation between the climate feedback and historical forcing for a given change in global‐mean temperature. Here, we examine the negative correlation between the radiative forcing due to aerosol‐cloud interactions and the shortwave cloud feedback to warming that appears in a perturbed parameter ensemble (PPE). The PPE is not tuned to match the historical record, yet a negative correlation emerges over the extratropics due to the combined effects of liquid cloud precipitation efficiency and radiative saturation in the shortwave. Using an energy balance model, we argue that these processes combine to push Earth System Models to yield a temperature record in keeping with observations, but also limit our ability to constrain future warming posterior with the temperature record.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 52(24)
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), University of Wyoming (US), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US), Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US), University of California San Diego (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.