Research on Rail Damage Detection Based on Improved DETR Algorithm

In rail damage detection, the scale variation of small targets leads to inaccurate extraction of damage morphology and size features, thereby affecting the reliable identification of damage types. The DETR algorithm has been optimized and improved. Firstly, we introduce the convolution–attention fusion module (CAFMAttention) after the two side convolutional layers of the original algorithm; then, we replace the nn.Upsample-based upsampling layer with the Dysample upsampler. Finally, we replace the Conv modules in the two down-sampled convolutional layers with Dual-Conv modules. The results of the comparative experiments show that the recall rate of the improved DETR model in this paper is 0.698, which is 12.2% higher than that of the original DETR model. The accuracy is 0.815, which is 2.3% higher than that of the original DETR model. The average precision ([email protected]) is 0.741. Compared with the original DETR model, it has been improved by 8.7%. The F1 score is 0.75, which is 8.7% higher than the original DETR model. The frame per second (FPS) transfer rate is 64.94, which is 2.6% higher than that of the original DETR model. The proposed DETR algorithm can detect rail damage under complex working conditions well, with high accuracy and robustness, and better meet the requirements of practical actual rail detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152413223
Primary Topic
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on Rail Damage Detection Based on Improved DETR Algorithm

Mengquan Wu, Rongkai Tan, Fengtao Lin, Sunyong Wu et al.
Applied Sciences
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
article

Research on Rail Damage Detection Based on Improved DETR Algorithm

Mengquan Wu, Rongkai Tan, Fengtao Lin, Sunyong Wu, Yang Yang
article en

Abstract

In rail damage detection, the scale variation of small targets leads to inaccurate extraction of damage morphology and size features, thereby affecting the reliable identification of damage types. The DETR algorithm has been optimized and improved. Firstly, we introduce the convolution–attention fusion module (CAFMAttention) after the two side convolutional layers of the original algorithm; then, we replace the nn.Upsample-based upsampling layer with the Dysample upsampler. Finally, we replace the Conv modules in the two down-sampled convolutional layers with Dual-Conv modules. The results of the comparative experiments show that the recall rate of the improved DETR model in this paper is 0.698, which is 12.2% higher than that of the original DETR model. The accuracy is 0.815, which is 2.3% higher than that of the original DETR model. The average precision ([email protected]) is 0.741. Compared with the original DETR model, it has been improved by 8.7%. The F1 score is 0.75, which is 8.7% higher than the original DETR model. The frame per second (FPS) transfer rate is 64.94, which is 2.6% higher than that of the original DETR model. The proposed DETR algorithm can detect rail damage under complex working conditions well, with high accuracy and robustness, and better meet the requirements of practical actual rail detection.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(24)
East China Jiaotong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.