Empathy and immigration: Public attitudes toward border security and deportation policies in the United States (forthcoming)

Immigration policy, particularly concerning border security and deportation, remains a deeply polarizing issue in U.S. politics. Although political ideology is a well-documented correlate of immigration attitudes, emotional and psychological mechanisms such as empathy may also play an important role. This study explores whether dispositional empathy predicts support for two controversial immigration policy issues: border enforcement (e.g., U.S.-Mexico border wall expansion, increased patrols) and the deportation of unauthorized immigrants. Drawing on survey data from 331 U.S. adults, our analyses revealed that empathy was significantly associated with lower support for deportation, even after controlling for political and demographic variables. Empathy is also related to reduced support for border security, but this effect weakened and became nonsignificant once ideology and other controls were introduced. Additionally, in line with prior research, conservatives showed higher support for both policies overall. However, individuals residing in Southern border states reported lower support for deportation. These findings highlight the role of emotional, psychological, geographical, and ideological influences on immigration policy preferences and offer important implications for policymakers and future research. Policy recommendations are discussed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
CrimRxiv
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.f591e76f
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empathy and immigration: Public attitudes toward border security and deportation policies in the United States (forthcoming)

Sunmin Hong, Haley N. Puddy, Alexander L. Burton, Cheryl Lero Jonson
CrimRxiv
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Empathy and immigration: Public attitudes toward border security and deportation policies in the United States (forthcoming)

Sunmin Hong, Haley N. Puddy, Alexander L. Burton, Cheryl Lero Jonson
article en

Abstract

Immigration policy, particularly concerning border security and deportation, remains a deeply polarizing issue in U.S. politics. Although political ideology is a well-documented correlate of immigration attitudes, emotional and psychological mechanisms such as empathy may also play an important role. This study explores whether dispositional empathy predicts support for two controversial immigration policy issues: border enforcement (e.g., U.S.-Mexico border wall expansion, increased patrols) and the deportation of unauthorized immigrants. Drawing on survey data from 331 U.S. adults, our analyses revealed that empathy was significantly associated with lower support for deportation, even after controlling for political and demographic variables. Empathy is also related to reduced support for border security, but this effect weakened and became nonsignificant once ideology and other controls were introduced. Additionally, in line with prior research, conservatives showed higher support for both policies overall. However, individuals residing in Southern border states reported lower support for deportation. These findings highlight the role of emotional, psychological, geographical, and ideological influences on immigration policy preferences and offer important implications for policymakers and future research. Policy recommendations are discussed.

CrimRxiv
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.