Beyond Asking the Right Questions: Accounting for Error and Bias in a Recreational Fishery Survey

Accurate information about anglers’ motivations, satisfaction, and fishing behavior is needed to design effective recreational fisheries management. This study used a comprehensive survey of Swedish anglers to explore the risk for common sampling strategies and survey response groupings to introduce significant error or biases that impact the interpretation of data. Angler motivation and satisfaction differed between anglers based on avidity, type of boat use, and gender. Measures of satisfaction from angling appear to be less affected by biases than general motivations, fishery specific motivations, and catch measures. Fishing season and place of residence have less relationship to psychological dimensions of survey responses, but remain important when considering target species. These results can guide data collection to more accurately measure the preferences and behaviors of different resource user groups, improve the design of regulations and management, and tailor communication to facilitate greater compliance and adoption of best practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Society & Natural Resources
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2025.2599778
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Asking the Right Questions: Accounting for Error and Bias in a Recreational Fishery Survey

Maria Ovegård, Ulf Bergström, Göran Sundblad, Samuel Blyth et al.
Society & Natural Resources
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
article

Beyond Asking the Right Questions: Accounting for Error and Bias in a Recreational Fishery Survey

Maria Ovegård, Ulf Bergström, Göran Sundblad, Samuel Blyth, Lotte Van Den Heuvel, Patrik Rönnbäck, Malgorzata Blicharska
article en

Abstract

Accurate information about anglers’ motivations, satisfaction, and fishing behavior is needed to design effective recreational fisheries management. This study used a comprehensive survey of Swedish anglers to explore the risk for common sampling strategies and survey response groupings to introduce significant error or biases that impact the interpretation of data. Angler motivation and satisfaction differed between anglers based on avidity, type of boat use, and gender. Measures of satisfaction from angling appear to be less affected by biases than general motivations, fishery specific motivations, and catch measures. Fishing season and place of residence have less relationship to psychological dimensions of survey responses, but remain important when considering target species. These results can guide data collection to more accurately measure the preferences and behaviors of different resource user groups, improve the design of regulations and management, and tailor communication to facilitate greater compliance and adoption of best practices.

Society & Natural Resources
Uppsala University (SE), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.