Disciplining Through Landlord Technologies: Why the Carceral Logics of Tenant Surveillance Require Abolition

Abstract Facial recognition and other surveillance systems are increasingly being deployed in low‐income housing across the United States, adding new scopic regimes into an already carceral propertied landscape. While there are numerous harms associated with facial recognition, for instance the reproduction of racial bias, the imposition of new landlord technologies also impels disciplinary and biopolitical control, abetting the reproduction of racial capitalist market logics and carceral geographies. In this article, we focus on this entwinement of biopolitical, capitalist, and carceral imperatives undergirding surveillance, drawing upon tenant stories conducted with Landlord Tech Watch. We assess the mechanisms through which landlord technologies are used to catch tenants for lease violations and automate evictions, while also impelling the production of the “good tenant”. In examining reformist efforts to curb facial recognition abuse, we argue that as long as property functions as a technology of control, reformism falls short. Instead, we engage a broader abolitionist call against property, one that disavows the enactment of goodness and that embraces performing the “bad tenant”.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antipode
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70102
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disciplining Through Landlord Technologies: Why the Carceral Logics of Tenant Surveillance Require Abolition

Erin McElroy, Diego Martinez‐Lugo
Antipode
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

Disciplining Through Landlord Technologies: Why the Carceral Logics of Tenant Surveillance Require Abolition

Erin McElroy, Diego Martinez‐Lugo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Facial recognition and other surveillance systems are increasingly being deployed in low‐income housing across the United States, adding new scopic regimes into an already carceral propertied landscape. While there are numerous harms associated with facial recognition, for instance the reproduction of racial bias, the imposition of new landlord technologies also impels disciplinary and biopolitical control, abetting the reproduction of racial capitalist market logics and carceral geographies. In this article, we focus on this entwinement of biopolitical, capitalist, and carceral imperatives undergirding surveillance, drawing upon tenant stories conducted with Landlord Tech Watch. We assess the mechanisms through which landlord technologies are used to catch tenants for lease violations and automate evictions, while also impelling the production of the “good tenant”. In examining reformist efforts to curb facial recognition abuse, we argue that as long as property functions as a technology of control, reformism falls short. Instead, we engage a broader abolitionist call against property, one that disavows the enactment of goodness and that embraces performing the “bad tenant”.

AntipodeVol. 58(1)
University of Washington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.