Exploring the Convergence of Curiosity Across Behavioural Tasks and Personality Trait Questionnaires

ABSTRACT Curiosity is considered a critical motivational force and virtue that encourages innovation and learning and drives us to explore the unknown. Psychologists tend to measure curiosity via responses on behavioural tasks or responses on personality trait questionnaires , and each measurement method has strengths and findings related to curiosity's predictors, putative mechanisms, and outcomes. Although behavioural and self‐report trait measures of curiosity have rarely been assessed within the same study, recent years have seen the beginning of such an endeavour, and this integration could permit cross‐pollination of ideas and hypotheses for future research. After providing a review of behavioural and self‐report measures of curiosity, I summarise how current evidence supports only mild overlap between the two measurement methods, with positive relations depending on the task measure and particular facet of trait curiosity chosen. Divergence between task and trait measures could suggest different cognitive/emotional mechanisms supporting the need to know. Employing multiple personality trait measures with behavioural tasks can help to gain an understanding of the boundaries, inconsistencies, and similarities between different measurements of curiosity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.70113
Primary Topic
Psychological and Educational Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Convergence of Curiosity Across Behavioural Tasks and Personality Trait Questionnaires

Hayley Jach
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Psychological and Educational Research Studies
article

Exploring the Convergence of Curiosity Across Behavioural Tasks and Personality Trait Questionnaires

Hayley Jach
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Curiosity is considered a critical motivational force and virtue that encourages innovation and learning and drives us to explore the unknown. Psychologists tend to measure curiosity via responses on behavioural tasks or responses on personality trait questionnaires , and each measurement method has strengths and findings related to curiosity's predictors, putative mechanisms, and outcomes. Although behavioural and self‐report trait measures of curiosity have rarely been assessed within the same study, recent years have seen the beginning of such an endeavour, and this integration could permit cross‐pollination of ideas and hypotheses for future research. After providing a review of behavioural and self‐report measures of curiosity, I summarise how current evidence supports only mild overlap between the two measurement methods, with positive relations depending on the task measure and particular facet of trait curiosity chosen. Divergence between task and trait measures could suggest different cognitive/emotional mechanisms supporting the need to know. Employing multiple personality trait measures with behavioural tasks can help to gain an understanding of the boundaries, inconsistencies, and similarities between different measurements of curiosity.

Social and Personality Psychology CompassVol. 19(12)
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Psychological and Educational Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.