Conserving climate‐change refugia: Insights from research and practice

Abstract As the impacts of anthropogenic climate change increase, conservation of climate‐change refugia has become a key strategy for effective environmental stewardship. Over the last 5 years, the field of climate‐change refugia conservation has made exciting advances, shifting from concepts and theory to refugia mapping and implementation. However, few studies have advanced to action on the ground; while 84% of studies identified and mapped refugia, only 4% involved implementing management action. Moreover, taxonomic and geographic gaps remain, with most studies focused on terrestrial plants and vertebrates in Europe and North America. Here, we outline impediments to implementation following the steps of the Climate‐Change Refugia Conservation Cycle. Based on a systematic literature review, we elucidate advances and obstacles with examples from a diversity of systems and sectors from across the world and highlight emerging work bridging the gap between research and implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70160
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conserving climate‐change refugia: Insights from research and practice

Lauren M. Lyon, Rachel A. Hovel, Sandra Słowińska, Toni Lyn Morelli et al.
3 citations
Conservation Science and Practice
Species Distribution and Climate Change
5.51
article

Conserving climate‐change refugia: Insights from research and practice

Lauren M. Lyon, Rachel A. Hovel, Sandra Słowińska, Toni Lyn Morelli, Man Hua, Megan K. Jennings, James H. Thorne, Diana Stralberg, Jessica Stolar, Christopher P. Nadeau, Cybil Nicole Cavalieri, Andrew J. Caven, Tina G. Mozelewski, Gregory Kehm, Jordon C. Tourville, Stephen F. Langdon, Meg A. Krawchuk, Gunnar Keppel, Aji John, Garrett W. Meigs, Joshua J. Lawler, Lindsay M. Dreiss, Benjamin Zuckerberg, Melissa Mora‐Gonzalez
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract As the impacts of anthropogenic climate change increase, conservation of climate‐change refugia has become a key strategy for effective environmental stewardship. Over the last 5 years, the field of climate‐change refugia conservation has made exciting advances, shifting from concepts and theory to refugia mapping and implementation. However, few studies have advanced to action on the ground; while 84% of studies identified and mapped refugia, only 4% involved implementing management action. Moreover, taxonomic and geographic gaps remain, with most studies focused on terrestrial plants and vertebrates in Europe and North America. Here, we outline impediments to implementation following the steps of the Climate‐Change Refugia Conservation Cycle. Based on a systematic literature review, we elucidate advances and obstacles with examples from a diversity of systems and sectors from across the world and highlight emerging work bridging the gap between research and implementation.

Conservation Science and PracticeVol. 8(1)
Canadian Forest Service (CA), Natural Resources Canada (CA), United States Geological Survey (US), Appalachian Mountain Club (US), Washington Department of Natural Resources (US), Oregon State University (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Alberta (CA), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of South Australia (AU), University of Maine at Farmington (US), University of Washington (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), San Diego State University (US), Geoscience BC (CA), World Wildlife Fund (US), Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Sciences (PL), Schoodic Institute (US), Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center (US), Conservation Science Partners (US), International Crane Foundation (US), Federal Reserve Bank of New York (US), Climate Adaptation Science Centers (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), University of California, Davis (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
5.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.