Finite Element Analysis of Maxillary Overdentures Supported by Two, Three, and Four Implants

This study aimed to evaluate, through finite element analysis (FEA), the biomechanical behavior of edentulous maxillary overdentures supported on 2, 3, and 4 implants with conometric connections, and to determine the minimum implant number that maintains stresses within physiological limits. A 3D finite element model of a resorbed edentulous maxilla was generated from CT images and processed in ANSYS v19.0. Subsequently, six models were simulated according to implant number (2, 3, or 4) and cortical bone thickness (0.5 mm or 1 mm). Conical connection implants and cobalt-chromium-reinforced overdentures with Equator attachments were modeled. Bilateral axial loads were applied and Von Mises equivalent stresses were calculated for implants and abutments, while maximum and minimum principal stresses were analyzed in bone. Results showed that the highest deformation and stress concentrations were observed in the two-implant models, with trabecular stresses ranging from 6.5 to 8.4 MPa, exceeding the 5 MPa safety threshold. In contrast, both three- and four-implant models maintained trabecular stresses below 3 MPa, while keeping cortical bone stresses within physiological limits. The three-implant tripod configuration demonstrated a comparable stress distribution to the four-implant models. From a biomechanical perspective, overdentures supported on four implants with 1 mm cortical thickness showed the most favorable performance. Nevertheless, the three-implant model represented a biomechanically acceptable and potentially cost-effective alternative, suggesting its viability as a simplified clinical option that warrants further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12121372
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Finite Element Analysis of Maxillary Overdentures Supported by Two, Three, and Four Implants

Eduardo Souza Leal, R. Hunter, Eduardo Borie, Benjamín Weber et al.
Bioengineering
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Finite Element Analysis of Maxillary Overdentures Supported by Two, Three, and Four Implants

Eduardo Souza Leal, R. Hunter, Eduardo Borie, Benjamín Weber, Francisco Fernández‐Gil
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate, through finite element analysis (FEA), the biomechanical behavior of edentulous maxillary overdentures supported on 2, 3, and 4 implants with conometric connections, and to determine the minimum implant number that maintains stresses within physiological limits. A 3D finite element model of a resorbed edentulous maxilla was generated from CT images and processed in ANSYS v19.0. Subsequently, six models were simulated according to implant number (2, 3, or 4) and cortical bone thickness (0.5 mm or 1 mm). Conical connection implants and cobalt-chromium-reinforced overdentures with Equator attachments were modeled. Bilateral axial loads were applied and Von Mises equivalent stresses were calculated for implants and abutments, while maximum and minimum principal stresses were analyzed in bone. Results showed that the highest deformation and stress concentrations were observed in the two-implant models, with trabecular stresses ranging from 6.5 to 8.4 MPa, exceeding the 5 MPa safety threshold. In contrast, both three- and four-implant models maintained trabecular stresses below 3 MPa, while keeping cortical bone stresses within physiological limits. The three-implant tripod configuration demonstrated a comparable stress distribution to the four-implant models. From a biomechanical perspective, overdentures supported on four implants with 1 mm cortical thickness showed the most favorable performance. Nevertheless, the three-implant model represented a biomechanically acceptable and potentially cost-effective alternative, suggesting its viability as a simplified clinical option that warrants further investigation.

BioengineeringVol. 12(12)
Universidad de La Frontera (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.