Why history matters: the critical importance of the 1998 ‘Houston Conference Guidelines’ for clinical neuropsychology training as a subspecialty

The historical underpinnings of the Houston Conference Guidelines (HCG) specifying educational, supervision, and training standards for clinical neuropsychology are reviewed from a personal perspective. This viewpoint comes from developing and directing doctoral and post-doctoral level training programs in clinical neuropsychology that followed the HCG at two major universities from 1977 to 2018, directly observing the importance of such specialization training for the field of clinical neuropsychology. The criteria outlined in the original HCG have proven their importance and the test of time for creating the structure that defines the clinical neuropsychology discipline, including who can designate their training as meeting these defining criteria for the practice of clinical neuropsychology. Through the lens of history, the rationale is outlined as to why these standards need to remain as originally specified in the HCG document.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2498710
Primary Topic
Counseling Practices and Supervision
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why history matters: the critical importance of the 1998 ‘Houston Conference Guidelines’ for clinical neuropsychology training as a subspecialty

Erin D. Bigler
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Counseling Practices and Supervision
article

Why history matters: the critical importance of the 1998 ‘Houston Conference Guidelines’ for clinical neuropsychology training as a subspecialty

Erin D. Bigler
article en

Abstract

The historical underpinnings of the Houston Conference Guidelines (HCG) specifying educational, supervision, and training standards for clinical neuropsychology are reviewed from a personal perspective. This viewpoint comes from developing and directing doctoral and post-doctoral level training programs in clinical neuropsychology that followed the HCG at two major universities from 1977 to 2018, directly observing the importance of such specialization training for the field of clinical neuropsychology. The criteria outlined in the original HCG have proven their importance and the test of time for creating the structure that defines the clinical neuropsychology discipline, including who can designate their training as meeting these defining criteria for the practice of clinical neuropsychology. Through the lens of history, the rationale is outlined as to why these standards need to remain as originally specified in the HCG document.

Journal of Clinical and Experimental NeuropsychologyVol. 47(9-10)
Brigham Young University (US), University of Utah (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Counseling Practices and Supervision
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why history matters: the critical importance of the 1998 ‘Houston Conference Guidelines’ for clinical neuropsychology training as a subspecialty — Erin D. Bigler · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS