Clinical Epidemiology, Patterns and Treatment of Maxillofacial Fractures in Children and Adolescents: A 15-Year Retrospective Study

This study aimed to describe the main clinical epidemiology, characteristics and treatment of pediatric maxillofacial fractures in different age groups. This research was a retrospective study that was conducted for 15 years in a tertiary hospital for oral and maxillofacial surgery from southeast China. Age, sex, etiology, type of fracture, treatment and concomitant injury were collected and analyzed from the data of the enrolled patients aged 0-18 years. The patients were categorized into three groups: ≤6 years old, 7–12 years old, and 13–18 years old. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, Version 27. The incidence was 16.37% (n=346/2114) and a total of 341 patients with maxillofacial fractures were followed up for at least 6 months. Fall from a height (FAH) was the primary cause of maxillofacial fractures in 0-6 age group, whereas Fall at ground level (FAG) predominated in 7-18 age group. Among the mandibular fractures, isolated condylar fractures were predominantly unilateral (p < 0.001, Cramér's V= 0.439), whereas condylar fractures that occured alongside a symphysis fracture were more likely to be bilateral (p< 0.001, Cramér's V=0.297). There were different clinical epidemiological features and characteristics of pediatric maxillofacial fractures in different age groups. And condylar fractures exhibit distinct pathogenic patterns and require specific therapeutic considerations. However,there were also some limitations in this retrospective study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-07283-6
Primary Topic
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Epidemiology, Patterns and Treatment of Maxillofacial Fractures in Children and Adolescents: A 15-Year Retrospective Study

Yan Jiang, Canyang Jiang, Lisong Lin, Xiao‐Jing Zhang et al.
BMC Oral Health
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
article

Clinical Epidemiology, Patterns and Treatment of Maxillofacial Fractures in Children and Adolescents: A 15-Year Retrospective Study

Yan Jiang, Canyang Jiang, Lisong Lin, Xiao‐Jing Zhang, Li Huang, Yuetao Wen
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the main clinical epidemiology, characteristics and treatment of pediatric maxillofacial fractures in different age groups. This research was a retrospective study that was conducted for 15 years in a tertiary hospital for oral and maxillofacial surgery from southeast China. Age, sex, etiology, type of fracture, treatment and concomitant injury were collected and analyzed from the data of the enrolled patients aged 0-18 years. The patients were categorized into three groups: ≤6 years old, 7–12 years old, and 13–18 years old. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, Version 27. The incidence was 16.37% (n=346/2114) and a total of 341 patients with maxillofacial fractures were followed up for at least 6 months. Fall from a height (FAH) was the primary cause of maxillofacial fractures in 0-6 age group, whereas Fall at ground level (FAG) predominated in 7-18 age group. Among the mandibular fractures, isolated condylar fractures were predominantly unilateral (p < 0.001, Cramér's V= 0.439), whereas condylar fractures that occured alongside a symphysis fracture were more likely to be bilateral (p< 0.001, Cramér's V=0.297). There were different clinical epidemiological features and characteristics of pediatric maxillofacial fractures in different age groups. And condylar fractures exhibit distinct pathogenic patterns and require specific therapeutic considerations. However,there were also some limitations in this retrospective study.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 26(1)
Fujian Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.