Interpretable everywhere

The goal of this paper is to account for the variable agreement properties of the 1PL pronoun a gente in Brazilian Portuguese. We argue that previous approaches make wrong predictions about how different types of agreement with a gente work in different environments (Costa & Pereira 2013; Taylor 2009, i.a.). As an alternative, we argue for a dual-feature approach that incorporates the distinction between ϕ-features that are semantically interpretable (INDEX features) and those that determine phonological exponents (CONCORD features) (Smith 2021; Wechsler & Zlati´c 2003). We propose that a gente has 1PL value for the former and a 3SG value for the latter and that both types of features can be targeted in non-anaphoric agreement (e.g. subject–verb agreement). The distinct usage preferences for different types of features in different environments follows from register considerations: structures where a gente is associated with overt 1PL exponents convey opposing social meanings. In order to capture this effect, we formulate a theory of social meaning composition based on formal models of honorification and conventional implicatures (cf. Machicao y Priemer et al. 2025; McCready 2019; Potts 2007; Varaschin et al. 2024).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Isogloss Open Journal of Romance Linguistics
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.576
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpretable everywhere

Giuseppe Varaschin, Antonio Machicao y Priemer
Isogloss Open Journal of Romance Linguistics
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

Interpretable everywhere

Giuseppe Varaschin, Antonio Machicao y Priemer
article en

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to account for the variable agreement properties of the 1PL pronoun a gente in Brazilian Portuguese. We argue that previous approaches make wrong predictions about how different types of agreement with a gente work in different environments (Costa & Pereira 2013; Taylor 2009, i.a.). As an alternative, we argue for a dual-feature approach that incorporates the distinction between ϕ-features that are semantically interpretable (INDEX features) and those that determine phonological exponents (CONCORD features) (Smith 2021; Wechsler & Zlati´c 2003). We propose that a gente has 1PL value for the former and a 3SG value for the latter and that both types of features can be targeted in non-anaphoric agreement (e.g. subject–verb agreement). The distinct usage preferences for different types of features in different environments follows from register considerations: structures where a gente is associated with overt 1PL exponents convey opposing social meanings. In order to capture this effect, we formulate a theory of social meaning composition based on formal models of honorification and conventional implicatures (cf. Machicao y Priemer et al. 2025; McCready 2019; Potts 2007; Varaschin et al. 2024).

Isogloss Open Journal of Romance LinguisticsVol. 11(7)
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Univerza v Ljubljani, Universidade do Minho, Masarykova Univerzita
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.