Comparative Analysis of Algorithms for the Fitting of Tessellations to 3D Image Data

This paper presents a comparative analysis of algorithmic strategies for fitting tessellation models to 3D image data of materials such as polycrystals and foams. In this steadily advancing field, we review and assess optimization-based methods -- including linear and nonlinear programming, stochastic optimization via the cross-entropy method, and gradient descent -- for generating Voronoi, Laguerre, and generalized balanced power diagrams (GBPDs) that approximate voxelbased grain structures. The quality of fit is evaluated on real-world datasets using discrepancy measures that quantify differences in grain volume, surface area, and topology. Our results highlight trade-offs between model complexity, the complexity of the optimization routines involved, and the quality of approximation, providing guidance for selecting appropriate methods based on data characteristics and application needs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-07-18
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Algorithms for the Fitting of Tessellations to 3D Image Data

Claudia Redenbach, Matthias Neumann, Andreas Alpers, Orkun Furat et al.
ArXiv.org
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Comparative Analysis of Algorithms for the Fitting of Tessellations to 3D Image Data

Claudia Redenbach, Matthias Neumann, Andreas Alpers, Orkun Furat, Christian Jung, Volker Schmidt, Aigerim Saken
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of algorithmic strategies for fitting tessellation models to 3D image data of materials such as polycrystals and foams. In this steadily advancing field, we review and assess optimization-based methods -- including linear and nonlinear programming, stochastic optimization via the cross-entropy method, and gradient descent -- for generating Voronoi, Laguerre, and generalized balanced power diagrams (GBPDs) that approximate voxelbased grain structures. The quality of fit is evaluated on real-world datasets using discrepancy measures that quantify differences in grain volume, surface area, and topology. Our results highlight trade-offs between model complexity, the complexity of the optimization routines involved, and the quality of approximation, providing guidance for selecting appropriate methods based on data characteristics and application needs.

ArXiv.org
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of Algorithms for the Fitting of Tessellations to 3D Image Data — Claudia Redenbach, Matthias Neumann, et al. · ArXiv.org (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS