Do plantar calcaneal spurs make the plantar aponeurosis enthesis stronger? A biomechanical analysis

Calcaneal spurs are shown to be increasingly prevalent in modern populations and often contribute to forming heel and foot pain. There are multiple hypotheses for their formation, including exercise, prolonged standing and obesity. The impact of these spurs on foot biomechanics remains unclear; it is suggested that their presence may contribute to enthesial avulsion forces. This study aimed to determine the avulsion properties of the plantar aponeurosis enthesis with and without spurs. Twenty-four feet from 15 cadavers donated to the Department of Anatomy at the University of Otago were used for this study. Tissues were X-rayed to determine the presence of spurs. The donor feet were dissected to isolate the calcanei. These were then mounted in a custom-developed 3D-printed clamping rig to perform tensile testing of the plantar calcaneal enthesis to determine pull-out forces of the central band of the plantar fascia. Biomechanical testing showed no statistically significant differences in avulsion properties between the spur (n = 7) and non-spur (n = 14) samples in any of the avulsion parameters investigated: F<sub>max</sub> (1121 ± 358 N vs. 953 ± 283 N, mean ± SD, p = 0.302) and εF<sub>max</sub> (53 ± 11% vs. 51 ± 13%, mean ± SD, p = 0.660). Despite this, the avulsion parameters were highly variable. The results of this study indicate that the pull-out force of the central band of the plantar fascia is unrelated to the presence of spurs. Therefore, it is less likely that plantar spurs fulfill a biomechanical function within the plantar fascia complex.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Anatomy
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.70090
Primary Topic
Tendon Structure and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do plantar calcaneal spurs make the plantar aponeurosis enthesis stronger? A biomechanical analysis

Kai Chun Li, Johann Zwirner, Joanna Tomlinson
Journal of Anatomy
Tendon Structure and Treatment
article

Do plantar calcaneal spurs make the plantar aponeurosis enthesis stronger? A biomechanical analysis

Kai Chun Li, Johann Zwirner, Joanna Tomlinson
article en

Abstract

Calcaneal spurs are shown to be increasingly prevalent in modern populations and often contribute to forming heel and foot pain. There are multiple hypotheses for their formation, including exercise, prolonged standing and obesity. The impact of these spurs on foot biomechanics remains unclear; it is suggested that their presence may contribute to enthesial avulsion forces. This study aimed to determine the avulsion properties of the plantar aponeurosis enthesis with and without spurs. Twenty-four feet from 15 cadavers donated to the Department of Anatomy at the University of Otago were used for this study. Tissues were X-rayed to determine the presence of spurs. The donor feet were dissected to isolate the calcanei. These were then mounted in a custom-developed 3D-printed clamping rig to perform tensile testing of the plantar calcaneal enthesis to determine pull-out forces of the central band of the plantar fascia. Biomechanical testing showed no statistically significant differences in avulsion properties between the spur (n = 7) and non-spur (n = 14) samples in any of the avulsion parameters investigated: F<sub>max</sub> (1121 ± 358 N vs. 953 ± 283 N, mean ± SD, p = 0.302) and εF<sub>max</sub> (53 ± 11% vs. 51 ± 13%, mean ± SD, p = 0.660). Despite this, the avulsion parameters were highly variable. The results of this study indicate that the pull-out force of the central band of the plantar fascia is unrelated to the presence of spurs. Therefore, it is less likely that plantar spurs fulfill a biomechanical function within the plantar fascia complex.

Journal of AnatomyVol. 248(4)
Universität Hamburg (DE), University of Bristol (GB), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), University of Otago (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Tendon Structure and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.