Stable or variable distrust? Disentangling the relationship between political trust and electoral behavior

Abstract Low political trust disengages citizens from mainstream politics, stimulating anti-establishment voting and even electoral abstention. However, existing scholarship has largely overlooked the temporal dynamics of political trust. Next to high versus low trust, our study identifies two additional components of political trust: its long-term variability and its short-term variation. We employ fifteen waves of the Dutch LISS panel (2008–2023) to systematically test the impact of these three components of political trust on electoral behavior. We find that there are systematic and meaningful differences between stable and variable (dis)trusters. While trust levels are the strongest predictor of both support for anti-establishment and abstention, trust variability has an additional effect on electoral behavior. Short-term declines in political trust increase the chances of anti-establishment voting and abstention, independent of individuals’ overall trust levels and variability. These findings have important implications for our understanding of democratic alienation and critical citizenship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Political Science Review
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773925100210
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stable or variable distrust? Disentangling the relationship between political trust and electoral behavior

Tom van der Meer, Armèn Hakhverdian, Carmen Rosalina Antonia van Alebeek
European Political Science Review
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Stable or variable distrust? Disentangling the relationship between political trust and electoral behavior

Tom van der Meer, Armèn Hakhverdian, Carmen Rosalina Antonia van Alebeek
article en

Abstract

Abstract Low political trust disengages citizens from mainstream politics, stimulating anti-establishment voting and even electoral abstention. However, existing scholarship has largely overlooked the temporal dynamics of political trust. Next to high versus low trust, our study identifies two additional components of political trust: its long-term variability and its short-term variation. We employ fifteen waves of the Dutch LISS panel (2008–2023) to systematically test the impact of these three components of political trust on electoral behavior. We find that there are systematic and meaningful differences between stable and variable (dis)trusters. While trust levels are the strongest predictor of both support for anti-establishment and abstention, trust variability has an additional effect on electoral behavior. Short-term declines in political trust increase the chances of anti-establishment voting and abstention, independent of individuals’ overall trust levels and variability. These findings have important implications for our understanding of democratic alienation and critical citizenship.

European Political Science ReviewVol. 18(1)
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Stable or variable distrust? Disentangling the relationship between political trust and electoral behavior — Tom van der Meer, Armèn Hakhverdian, et al. · European Political Science Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS