Evaluation of immune-endothelial activation markers for the differentiation of severe dengue

Severe dengue (SD) or dengue hemorrhagic fever is characterized by immune hyperactivation, endothelial dysfunction and vascular leakage. Early detection of the onset of SD, particularly during the febrile phase or before the onset of the critical phase is highly desirable. However, most dengue patients present late (≥ 5 days of illness) to the hospital, which coincides with the beginning of the critical phase. Biomarkers associated with these pathological processes may therefore serve as severity-associated markers. This study investigated the clinical utility of the immune-endothelial activation panel as a potential indicator for differentiating SD from dengue fever (DF). A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted using sera of clinically- and laboratory-confirmed SD and DF patients, non-dengue febrile illness patients (NDFI) and healthy individuals. Serum levels of monocyte/macrophage activation markers CD163, CD14 and ferritin; endothelial activation and vascular permeability markers SDC-1 and VCAM-1; and cytokines CCL2, CCL3, CXCL9, CXCL10 and IL-10 were measured by ELISA or immunoplex assays. The ability to distinguish SD from DF was measured using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. CD163, ferritin, SDC-1, VCAM-1 and CCL2 levels were significantly different between SD and DF, as well as between DF and NDFI. CD163, SDC-1 and VCAM-1 levels differed significantly between primary and secondary dengue. These indicators performed moderately as standalones in distinguishing SD from DF. However, a combination of SDC-1, CD163 and VCAM-1 improved diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.784, 95% Cl:0.725–0.835). Notably, combining AST, a hepatic injury marker with all four indicators (SDC-1, CD163, VCAM-1 and ferritin) significantly enhanced the diagnostic performance of this panel (AUC = 0.850, 95% Cl: 0.781–0.904). A multi-marker panel consisting of immune-endothelial activation and hepatic injury can increase the accuracy of identifying SD during the critical phase of the illness. Given the absence of a specific test for the detection of impending SD, the strength of this multi-marker panel may support timely decision-making for high-risk patient management while safely discharging others to optimise the usage of hospital resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Translational Medicine
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-025-07521-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of immune-endothelial activation markers for the differentiation of severe dengue

Sing‐Sin Sam, E. Mageswaren, Suzana Misbah, A Azmel et al.
1 citations
Journal of Translational Medicine
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
1.88
article

Evaluation of immune-endothelial activation markers for the differentiation of severe dengue

Sing‐Sin Sam, E. Mageswaren, Suzana Misbah, A Azmel, A Shunmugarajoo, Pooi‐Fong Wong, Y. H. Khor, Sazaly AbuBakar, Ahmad Kashfi Ab Rahman, Yih-Harng Soh, Kind-Leng Tong, Puteri Nasyitah Aina binti Kamal Faizul
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Severe dengue (SD) or dengue hemorrhagic fever is characterized by immune hyperactivation, endothelial dysfunction and vascular leakage. Early detection of the onset of SD, particularly during the febrile phase or before the onset of the critical phase is highly desirable. However, most dengue patients present late (≥ 5 days of illness) to the hospital, which coincides with the beginning of the critical phase. Biomarkers associated with these pathological processes may therefore serve as severity-associated markers. This study investigated the clinical utility of the immune-endothelial activation panel as a potential indicator for differentiating SD from dengue fever (DF). A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted using sera of clinically- and laboratory-confirmed SD and DF patients, non-dengue febrile illness patients (NDFI) and healthy individuals. Serum levels of monocyte/macrophage activation markers CD163, CD14 and ferritin; endothelial activation and vascular permeability markers SDC-1 and VCAM-1; and cytokines CCL2, CCL3, CXCL9, CXCL10 and IL-10 were measured by ELISA or immunoplex assays. The ability to distinguish SD from DF was measured using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. CD163, ferritin, SDC-1, VCAM-1 and CCL2 levels were significantly different between SD and DF, as well as between DF and NDFI. CD163, SDC-1 and VCAM-1 levels differed significantly between primary and secondary dengue. These indicators performed moderately as standalones in distinguishing SD from DF. However, a combination of SDC-1, CD163 and VCAM-1 improved diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.784, 95% Cl:0.725–0.835). Notably, combining AST, a hepatic injury marker with all four indicators (SDC-1, CD163, VCAM-1 and ferritin) significantly enhanced the diagnostic performance of this panel (AUC = 0.850, 95% Cl: 0.781–0.904). A multi-marker panel consisting of immune-endothelial activation and hepatic injury can increase the accuracy of identifying SD during the critical phase of the illness. Given the absence of a specific test for the detection of impending SD, the strength of this multi-marker panel may support timely decision-making for high-risk patient management while safely discharging others to optimise the usage of hospital resources.

Journal of Translational MedicineVol. 24(1)
University Malaya Medical Centre (MY), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (MY), University of Malaya (MY), Hospital Sultanah Nur Zahirah (MY), Manipal University College Malaysia (MY), Tengku Ampuan Rahimah Hospital (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.