A cost-effectiveness analysis of melatonin in comparison with midazolam for anxiety prior to general anaesthesia in children: the MAGIC randomised controlled trial (melatonin for anxiety prior to general anaesthesia in children)

To date no study has looked at the cost-effectiveness of melatonin for anxiety prior to general anaesthetic in children or young people. The aim of the health economic analysis was to evaluate the within trial cost-effectiveness of melatonin for anxiety in children compared to usual care (midazolam) prior to general anaesthesia in children from an NHS and Personal Social Services perspective. The economic evaluation was undertaken alongside a multicentre randomised controlled trial (MAGIC). Children were individually randomised to receive either melatonin or midazolam for anxiety prior to general anaesthesia. Resource use was collected from case-record forms. Children were followed up at 14 days post-surgery. The main outcome was the incremental cost per successful procedure. The trial was closed early due to recruitment futility, which limited the studies statistical power. A total of 100 children received the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) treatment, 50 receiving melatonin and 50 receiving midazolam, these were the focus of the health economic analysis. On average, costs over 14 days were lower for those who received melatonin (-£46.20, 95% CI: -£166.14 to £66.74) with a mean incremental difference in procedure success of -0.02 (95% CI –0.08 to 0.004), though there was uncertainty around the results. There was no evidence of either treatment being cost-effective in a cost per QALY analysis using the CHU-9D (-£46.20, 95% CI: -£166.142 to £66.74) with a mean incremental QALY -0.0001 (95% CI –0.0008 to 0.0008). Subgroup analysis was limited to those who underwent head and neck procedures owing to small numbers by subgroup for other procedure types and age group and results were similar to the main analysis. This is the first study to examine the cost-effectiveness of melatonin in comparison with midazolam in children. The results were inconclusive showing no evidence that melatonin was more cost-effective than midazolam. The study closed early owing to issues with recruitment, which reduced the studies statistical power, and this has limited the economic analysis. Registered with the UK Clinical Study Registry ISRCTN18296119 on 10/01/2019.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Anesthesiology
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03489-x
Primary Topic
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A cost-effectiveness analysis of melatonin in comparison with midazolam for anxiety prior to general anaesthesia in children: the MAGIC randomised controlled trial (melatonin for anxiety prior to general anaesthesia in children)

Zoe Marshman, Amy Norrington, Claire Biercamp, Katie Mellor et al.
BMC Anesthesiology
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
article

A cost-effectiveness analysis of melatonin in comparison with midazolam for anxiety prior to general anaesthesia in children: the MAGIC randomised controlled trial (melatonin for anxiety prior to general anaesthesia in children)

Zoe Marshman, Amy Norrington, Claire Biercamp, Katie Mellor, Rachel Smith, Padma Gopal, Ayman Eissa, Munyaradzi Dimairo, R. Paton, Marie Hyslop, Amanda Loban, Jennifer Kettle, Christopher R. Vernazza, Laura Marie Armstrong, Nikki Totton, Robert Bolt, Ian Leeuwenberg, Tracey Young, Puran Khandelwal, Nicholas Ireland, R. J. Simmonds, Laura Flight, Elena Sheldon, Chris Deery, Margaret Babb, Jacqui Gath, Sondos Albadri, Gil Gavel, Tim Geary, Graham Wilson, Edward Pickles, Katie Biggs, Esther Herbert, Jamie Hall, Diana Papaioannou, Vimmi Oshan, J.R. Yates, Anna Thomason, Enass Duro, Jaydip Ray, Fiona Gilchrist, Sian Rolfe, Christopher Evans, Pranav Kukreja, Helen Rodd, Jan Clarkson, Matthew Wilson, Simon Waterhouse, Mike Bradburn, Julie Child-Cavill, Kate Hutchence, Simon Atkins, James Limb, Sean Cope, Jaimie Buckley, Ashok Sundar, Anthony Moores, Nuria Masip, Simon Crawley
article en

Abstract

To date no study has looked at the cost-effectiveness of melatonin for anxiety prior to general anaesthetic in children or young people. The aim of the health economic analysis was to evaluate the within trial cost-effectiveness of melatonin for anxiety in children compared to usual care (midazolam) prior to general anaesthesia in children from an NHS and Personal Social Services perspective. The economic evaluation was undertaken alongside a multicentre randomised controlled trial (MAGIC). Children were individually randomised to receive either melatonin or midazolam for anxiety prior to general anaesthesia. Resource use was collected from case-record forms. Children were followed up at 14 days post-surgery. The main outcome was the incremental cost per successful procedure. The trial was closed early due to recruitment futility, which limited the studies statistical power. A total of 100 children received the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) treatment, 50 receiving melatonin and 50 receiving midazolam, these were the focus of the health economic analysis. On average, costs over 14 days were lower for those who received melatonin (-£46.20, 95% CI: -£166.14 to £66.74) with a mean incremental difference in procedure success of -0.02 (95% CI –0.08 to 0.004), though there was uncertainty around the results. There was no evidence of either treatment being cost-effective in a cost per QALY analysis using the CHU-9D (-£46.20, 95% CI: -£166.142 to £66.74) with a mean incremental QALY -0.0001 (95% CI –0.0008 to 0.0008). Subgroup analysis was limited to those who underwent head and neck procedures owing to small numbers by subgroup for other procedure types and age group and results were similar to the main analysis. This is the first study to examine the cost-effectiveness of melatonin in comparison with midazolam in children. The results were inconclusive showing no evidence that melatonin was more cost-effective than midazolam. The study closed early owing to issues with recruitment, which reduced the studies statistical power, and this has limited the economic analysis. Registered with the UK Clinical Study Registry ISRCTN18296119 on 10/01/2019.

BMC AnesthesiologyVol. 26(1)
Newcastle Dental Hospital (GB), Newcastle University (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.