Opportunities of ecosystem service assessments to inform the different phases of disaster risk management

• Ecosystem service assessments can guide all phases of disaster risk management. • Typology illustrating how ecosystem assessments inform disaster risk management. • Opportunities for collaboration between ecology and disaster risk science. • New opportunities to use ecosystem services assessments in disaster risk reduction. Ecosystem service assessments (ESA) have proven to be powerful tools for integrating ecological knowledge and values of nature into relevant decision-making processes. Ecosystems and their services play an important role in disaster risk management (DRM), and ecosystem-based approaches are widely used as strategies for disaster risk reduction. As disaster risk becomes an increasing global concern, enhancing DRM efforts must become more comprehensive by integrating environmental considerations. While the knowledge generated by ESA offers significant potential for advancing DRM, it is not well understood how this information can be systematically integrated into DRM processes. Consequently, ESA are not consistently considered as instruments for DRM. This study addresses this gap by identifying how the current literature connects ESA results to the various phases of DRM: preparedness, response & relief, recovery & reconstruction, risk assessment & planning, mitigation & ongoing risk reduction, and prevention. A typology of opportunities for ESA to inform DRM phases is then developed based on evidence from the reviewed literature. This typology serves as the starting point of a new path towards more integration of ESA information in DRM, as the findings reveal that ESA results can significantly inform practical aspects of DRM, providing specific insights for different DRM phases. This study demonstrates that the benefits of ecosystems to society extend beyond delivering ecosystem services (ES), as knowledge about these ES can influence planning and decision-making processes in DRM. Therefore, this research calls for increased collaboration between the ESA and DRM fields to leverage the full potential of ESA to enhance DRM, fostering innovative solutions and comprehensive strategies to better protect communities and create resilient societies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosystem Services
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101797
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opportunities of ecosystem service assessments to inform the different phases of disaster risk management

Yvonne Walz, Liliana Narvaez, Zita Sebesvári, Andrea Ortiz-Vargas et al.
Ecosystem Services
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Opportunities of ecosystem service assessments to inform the different phases of disaster risk management

Yvonne Walz, Liliana Narvaez, Zita Sebesvári, Andrea Ortiz-Vargas, Sally Janzen
article en

Abstract

• Ecosystem service assessments can guide all phases of disaster risk management. • Typology illustrating how ecosystem assessments inform disaster risk management. • Opportunities for collaboration between ecology and disaster risk science. • New opportunities to use ecosystem services assessments in disaster risk reduction. Ecosystem service assessments (ESA) have proven to be powerful tools for integrating ecological knowledge and values of nature into relevant decision-making processes. Ecosystems and their services play an important role in disaster risk management (DRM), and ecosystem-based approaches are widely used as strategies for disaster risk reduction. As disaster risk becomes an increasing global concern, enhancing DRM efforts must become more comprehensive by integrating environmental considerations. While the knowledge generated by ESA offers significant potential for advancing DRM, it is not well understood how this information can be systematically integrated into DRM processes. Consequently, ESA are not consistently considered as instruments for DRM. This study addresses this gap by identifying how the current literature connects ESA results to the various phases of DRM: preparedness, response & relief, recovery & reconstruction, risk assessment & planning, mitigation & ongoing risk reduction, and prevention. A typology of opportunities for ESA to inform DRM phases is then developed based on evidence from the reviewed literature. This typology serves as the starting point of a new path towards more integration of ESA information in DRM, as the findings reveal that ESA results can significantly inform practical aspects of DRM, providing specific insights for different DRM phases. This study demonstrates that the benefits of ecosystems to society extend beyond delivering ecosystem services (ES), as knowledge about these ES can influence planning and decision-making processes in DRM. Therefore, this research calls for increased collaboration between the ESA and DRM fields to leverage the full potential of ESA to enhance DRM, fostering innovative solutions and comprehensive strategies to better protect communities and create resilient societies.

Ecosystem ServicesVol. 77
University of Bonn (DE), United Nations University (DE), Institute for Environment and Human Security (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.