Ingroup Categorization of Robots Is Affected by Self-Cognitions and Level of Anthropomorphism

Objective: The purpose of this work was to examine the relationship between self-concept and ingroup/outgroup categorization of robots. Background: Social psychological literature can improve Human–Robot Interaction (HRI) through investigations about cultural differences, intergroup dynamics, and more. Parallel to human–human interaction, people categorize robots as ingroup (“my group”) or outgroup (“not my group”) based on a myriad of variables. They favor ingroup robots by viewing them as more positive and human-like versus outgroup robots or humans. Previous work has examined the effect of robot anthropomorphism (i.e., human-likeness) on this categorization process with diverse findings. Method: Examining the self-concept via the two-baskets theory of self-cognitions, we compared the ingroup categorization of Humans, Machine-like robots, Medium Human-like robots, and High Human-like robots using a simple categorization task. Results: Results indicate that robots and human are categorized to the ingroup correlating with the uncanny valley effect, with humans being most likely to the ingroup followed by Medium Human-like, Machine-like, and High Human-like. Conclusions: Self-concept may not be as important for categorization as other factors; however, important categorization differences exist following the trend of the uncanny valley. Application: Those who design and utilize robots should take categorization differences into consideration when designing robots for public interactions. Further, those who purchase robots for use should be careful to consider the implications of visual similarities to human beings to ensure optimal acceptance OSF: ( https://osf.io/x9rqn/?view_only=fd0894404e304422a6c77ccffa013bcd ). Precis: Considering the uncanny valley, we examine the social categorization of humans and robots and the relation of this categorization to the self-concept in the form of self-cognitions. Results demonstrate important differences in the categorization of various types of human and robot images based strongly on the uncanny valley effect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3785149
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ingroup Categorization of Robots Is Affected by Self-Cognitions and Level of Anthropomorphism

Filipa Correia, Ricarda Wullenkord, Cobe Wilson, Marlena R. Fraune
ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
article

Ingroup Categorization of Robots Is Affected by Self-Cognitions and Level of Anthropomorphism

Filipa Correia, Ricarda Wullenkord, Cobe Wilson, Marlena R. Fraune
article en

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this work was to examine the relationship between self-concept and ingroup/outgroup categorization of robots. Background: Social psychological literature can improve Human–Robot Interaction (HRI) through investigations about cultural differences, intergroup dynamics, and more. Parallel to human–human interaction, people categorize robots as ingroup (“my group”) or outgroup (“not my group”) based on a myriad of variables. They favor ingroup robots by viewing them as more positive and human-like versus outgroup robots or humans. Previous work has examined the effect of robot anthropomorphism (i.e., human-likeness) on this categorization process with diverse findings. Method: Examining the self-concept via the two-baskets theory of self-cognitions, we compared the ingroup categorization of Humans, Machine-like robots, Medium Human-like robots, and High Human-like robots using a simple categorization task. Results: Results indicate that robots and human are categorized to the ingroup correlating with the uncanny valley effect, with humans being most likely to the ingroup followed by Medium Human-like, Machine-like, and High Human-like. Conclusions: Self-concept may not be as important for categorization as other factors; however, important categorization differences exist following the trend of the uncanny valley. Application: Those who design and utilize robots should take categorization differences into consideration when designing robots for public interactions. Further, those who purchase robots for use should be careful to consider the implications of visual similarities to human beings to ensure optimal acceptance OSF: ( https://osf.io/x9rqn/?view_only=fd0894404e304422a6c77ccffa013bcd ). Precis: Considering the uncanny valley, we examine the social categorization of humans and robots and the relation of this categorization to the self-concept in the form of self-cognitions. Results demonstrate important differences in the categorization of various types of human and robot images based strongly on the uncanny valley effect.

ACM Transactions on Human-Robot InteractionVol. 15(3)
New Mexico State University (US), University of Lisbon (PT), Bielefeld University (DE), Active Technologies (Italy) (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.