The digital transformation and the inclusive economy: navigating the risks

The article examines the paradoxical relationship between the development of an inclusive economy and the emergence of digital neo-feudalism.While central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and asset tokenisation are presented as instruments for enhancing financial inclusion, reducing transaction costs, and supporting social stability, they simultaneously create unprecedented opportunities for state and corporate control over economic activities and personal data.The research highlights the dual nature of digital financial innovations: on the one hand, they democratise access to financial services and stimulate the development of small and medium-sized businesses; on the other hand, they concentrate power in the hands of central banks and digital platforms, fostering new forms of dependence.The study employs theoretical and comparative analysis to show how the combination of state regulation, Big Data, and technological monopolies can reproduce hierarchical structures reminiscent of neo-feudalism in a digitalised society.The findings suggest that the path toward an inclusive economy requires critical attention to ethical and institutional safeguards to avoid the risks of digital authoritarianism and the privatisation of social control.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9770/s4626758963
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The digital transformation and the inclusive economy: navigating the risks

Vladimír Menshikov, Oksana Ruža, Jurijs Baltgailis
Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
article

The digital transformation and the inclusive economy: navigating the risks

Vladimír Menshikov, Oksana Ruža, Jurijs Baltgailis
article en

Abstract

The article examines the paradoxical relationship between the development of an inclusive economy and the emergence of digital neo-feudalism.While central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and asset tokenisation are presented as instruments for enhancing financial inclusion, reducing transaction costs, and supporting social stability, they simultaneously create unprecedented opportunities for state and corporate control over economic activities and personal data.The research highlights the dual nature of digital financial innovations: on the one hand, they democratise access to financial services and stimulate the development of small and medium-sized businesses; on the other hand, they concentrate power in the hands of central banks and digital platforms, fostering new forms of dependence.The study employs theoretical and comparative analysis to show how the combination of state regulation, Big Data, and technological monopolies can reproduce hierarchical structures reminiscent of neo-feudalism in a digitalised society.The findings suggest that the path toward an inclusive economy requires critical attention to ethical and institutional safeguards to avoid the risks of digital authoritarianism and the privatisation of social control.

Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability IssuesVol. 13(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The digital transformation and the inclusive economy: navigating the risks — Vladimír Menshikov, Oksana Ruža, et al. · Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS