Enterprise digital resilience capability framework: an integrated dynamic capability approach

This paper addresses how organisations can develop integrated capabilities to withstand digital disruptions while leveraging them strategically.Three critical gaps are identified: treating digital risk management operationally rather than strategically, using inadequate linear risk models, and lacking practical implementation guidance.The research develops a comprehensive framework integrating dynamic capabilities theory with enterprise resilience, establishes measurable constructs, and provides a practical maturity model.A multi-stage conceptual development methodology was employed: systematic literature integration across digital transformation, enterprise resilience, and dynamic capabilities; iterative framework development; expert validation using modified Delphi methodology with 12 experts achieving strong agreement (kappa=0.83);and implementation roadmap creation for different maturity levels.The Digital Resilience Capability Framework establishes relationships between three components-Anticipatory Intelligence System, Adaptive Response Architecture, and Strategic Transformation Capability-mapping to Teece's sensing-seizingreconfiguring taxonomy.Six integration pathways create a cohesive system exhibiting recursive learning, temporal integration, crossboundary integration, and value amplification.The Digital Resilience Maturity Matrix formalises resilience as evolving through five progressive levels from Reactive to Transformative.This research addresses theoretical triangulation by integrating dynamic capabilities theory, complex adaptive systems, and enterprise resilience.It operationalises how dynamic capabilities enable digital resilience and reconceptualises resilience as a strategic meta-capability, challenging risk-avoidance paradigms.Complex adaptive systems principles explain how component interactions generate amplified resilience value.The framework provides structured capability development, balancing immediate mitigation with long-term advantage.The maturity matrix enables precise diagnostic assessment while integration mechanisms ensure cohesive system functionality.The Digital Value Resilience Ratio quantifies strategic benefits beyond risk avoidance, strengthening business cases for resilience investments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9770/e4483987593
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enterprise digital resilience capability framework: an integrated dynamic capability approach

Serhii Zubkov, Victoria Grosul, Volodymyr Yermachenko, Alina Kolesnyk et al.
Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
article

Enterprise digital resilience capability framework: an integrated dynamic capability approach

Serhii Zubkov, Victoria Grosul, Volodymyr Yermachenko, Alina Kolesnyk, Marek Semerád
article en

Abstract

This paper addresses how organisations can develop integrated capabilities to withstand digital disruptions while leveraging them strategically.Three critical gaps are identified: treating digital risk management operationally rather than strategically, using inadequate linear risk models, and lacking practical implementation guidance.The research develops a comprehensive framework integrating dynamic capabilities theory with enterprise resilience, establishes measurable constructs, and provides a practical maturity model.A multi-stage conceptual development methodology was employed: systematic literature integration across digital transformation, enterprise resilience, and dynamic capabilities; iterative framework development; expert validation using modified Delphi methodology with 12 experts achieving strong agreement (kappa=0.83);and implementation roadmap creation for different maturity levels.The Digital Resilience Capability Framework establishes relationships between three components-Anticipatory Intelligence System, Adaptive Response Architecture, and Strategic Transformation Capability-mapping to Teece's sensing-seizingreconfiguring taxonomy.Six integration pathways create a cohesive system exhibiting recursive learning, temporal integration, crossboundary integration, and value amplification.The Digital Resilience Maturity Matrix formalises resilience as evolving through five progressive levels from Reactive to Transformative.This research addresses theoretical triangulation by integrating dynamic capabilities theory, complex adaptive systems, and enterprise resilience.It operationalises how dynamic capabilities enable digital resilience and reconceptualises resilience as a strategic meta-capability, challenging risk-avoidance paradigms.Complex adaptive systems principles explain how component interactions generate amplified resilience value.The framework provides structured capability development, balancing immediate mitigation with long-term advantage.The maturity matrix enables precise diagnostic assessment while integration mechanisms ensure cohesive system functionality.The Digital Value Resilience Ratio quantifies strategic benefits beyond risk avoidance, strengthening business cases for resilience investments.

Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability IssuesVol. 13(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.